DAGVX vs. AVERX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund (DAGVX) and Ave Maria Value Focused Fund (AVERX).

DAGVX is managed by BNY Mellon. It was launched on Sep 29, 1995. AVERX is a passively managed fund by Schwartz Investment Counsel that tracks the performance of the S&P 500® Index. It was launched on Jan 1, 1984.

Performance

DAGVX vs. AVERX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund (DAGVX) and Ave Maria Value Focused Fund (AVERX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

DAGVX vs. AVERX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DAGVX BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund	2.23%	20.63%
AVERX Ave Maria Value Focused Fund	19.97%	0.37%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DAGVX achieves a 2.23% return, which is significantly lower than AVERX's 19.97% return.

DAGVX

• 1D: 2.17%
• 1M: -3.96%
• YTD: 2.23%
• 6M: 7.27%
• 1Y: 18.00%
• 3Y*: 15.62%
• 5Y*: 12.42%
• 10Y*: 12.72%

AVERX

• 1D: 1.67%
• 1M: -6.66%
• YTD: 19.97%
• 6M: 18.80%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DAGVX vs. AVERX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DAGVX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is lower than AVERX's 1.26% expense ratio.

AVERX

Ave Maria Value Focused Fund

DAGVX

BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund

Return for Risk

DAGVX vs. AVERX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DAGVX

DAGVX Risk / Return Rank: 59
DAGVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
DAGVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
DAGVX Omega Ratio Rank: 54
DAGVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
DAGVX Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DAGVX vs. AVERX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund (DAGVX) and Ave Maria Value Focused Fund (AVERX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DAGVX	AVERX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.06	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.52	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.54	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.79	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DAGVX	AVERX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.06	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.56	1.17	-0.61

Correlation

The correlation between DAGVX and AVERX is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

DAGVX vs. AVERX - Dividend Comparison

DAGVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.54%, more than AVERX's 0.34% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DAGVX BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund	6.54%	6.69%	6.85%	5.09%	7.96%	21.64%	2.64%	3.29%	17.81%	10.71%	2.72%	15.78%
AVERX Ave Maria Value Focused Fund	0.34%	0.41%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

DAGVX vs. AVERX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DAGVX drawdown since its inception was -55.04%, which is greater than AVERX's maximum drawdown of -11.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAGVX and AVERX.

Drawdown Indicators

	DAGVX	AVERX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.04%	-11.33%	-43.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.23%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.96%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.62%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.66%	-6.66%	+2.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.69%	-5.39%	-2.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.77%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DAGVX	AVERX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.71%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.12%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.89%	19.13%	-2.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.58%	19.13%	-3.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.82%	19.13%	-0.31%