DAGVX vs. ACIIX
Compare and contrast key facts about BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund (DAGVX) and American Century Equity Income Fund Class I (ACIIX).
DAGVX is managed by BNY Mellon. It was launched on Sep 29, 1995. ACIIX is managed by American Century. It was launched on Jul 8, 1998.
Performance
DAGVX vs. ACIIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DAGVX vs. ACIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DAGVX BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund | 2.23% | 18.20% | 14.16% | 12.54% | 1.43% | 30.90% | 3.66% | 26.74% | -10.76% | 14.78% |
ACIIX American Century Equity Income Fund Class I | 3.68% | 12.05% | 10.58% | 4.25% | -2.96% | 17.16% | 1.19% | 24.50% | -3.53% | 13.69% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DAGVX achieves a 2.23% return, which is significantly lower than ACIIX's 3.68% return. Over the past 10 years, DAGVX has outperformed ACIIX with an annualized return of 12.72%, while ACIIX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.99% annualized return.
DAGVX
- 1D
- 2.17%
- 1M
- -3.96%
- YTD
- 2.23%
- 6M
- 7.27%
- 1Y
- 18.00%
- 3Y*
- 15.62%
- 5Y*
- 12.42%
- 10Y*
- 12.72%
ACIIX
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- -4.65%
- YTD
- 3.68%
- 6M
- 5.70%
- 1Y
- 11.45%
- 3Y*
- 10.04%
- 5Y*
- 7.60%
- 10Y*
- 8.99%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DAGVX vs. ACIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DAGVX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than ACIIX's 0.72% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DAGVX vs. ACIIX — Risk / Return Rank
DAGVX
ACIIX
DAGVX vs. ACIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund (DAGVX) and American Century Equity Income Fund Class I (ACIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DAGVX | ACIIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.06 | 0.95 | +0.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.52 | 1.37 | +0.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.19 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.54 | 1.29 | +0.24 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.79 | 5.04 | +1.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DAGVX | ACIIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.06 | 0.95 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.71 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | 0.67 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.53 | +0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between DAGVX and ACIIX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
DAGVX vs. ACIIX - Dividend Comparison
DAGVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.54%, less than ACIIX's 10.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DAGVX BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund | 6.54% | 6.69% | 6.85% | 5.09% | 7.96% | 21.64% | 2.64% | 3.29% | 17.81% | 10.71% | 2.72% | 15.78% |
ACIIX American Century Equity Income Fund Class I | 10.19% | 10.55% | 11.71% | 8.21% | 8.96% | 7.02% | 2.18% | 7.57% | 9.05% | 12.14% | 8.08% | 10.72% |
Drawdowns
DAGVX vs. ACIIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DAGVX drawdown since its inception was -55.04%, which is greater than ACIIX's maximum drawdown of -39.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAGVX and ACIIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DAGVX | ACIIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.04% | -39.16% | -15.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.23% | -8.96% | -3.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.96% | -13.49% | -3.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.62% | -32.76% | -9.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.66% | -4.86% | +0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.69% | -5.26% | -2.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.77% | 2.32% | +0.45% |
Volatility
DAGVX vs. ACIIX - Volatility Comparison
BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund (DAGVX) has a higher volatility of 4.71% compared to American Century Equity Income Fund Class I (ACIIX) at 3.01%. This indicates that DAGVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACIIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DAGVX | ACIIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.71% | 3.01% | +1.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.12% | 6.12% | +3.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.89% | 11.62% | +5.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.58% | 10.74% | +4.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.82% | 13.37% | +5.45% |