DAFGX vs. TILIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Dunham Focused Large Cap Growth Fund (DAFGX) and TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (TILIX).
DAFGX is managed by Dunham. It was launched on Dec 8, 2011. TILIX is managed by TIAA Investments. It was launched on Oct 1, 2002.
Performance
DAFGX vs. TILIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DAFGX vs. TILIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DAFGX Dunham Focused Large Cap Growth Fund | -19.07% | 1.72% | 11.42% | 54.81% | -38.96% | 13.01% | 49.42% | 35.17% | 9.80% | 26.10% |
TILIX TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | -13.04% | 18.41% | 33.31% | 42.64% | -29.22% | 27.63% | 38.43% | 36.30% | -1.66% | 28.49% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DAFGX achieves a -19.07% return, which is significantly lower than TILIX's -13.04% return. Over the past 10 years, DAFGX has underperformed TILIX with an annualized return of 10.50%, while TILIX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.09% annualized return.
DAFGX
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -8.97%
- YTD
- -19.07%
- 6M
- -24.16%
- 1Y
- -6.47%
- 3Y*
- 5.30%
- 5Y*
- 0.14%
- 10Y*
- 10.50%
TILIX
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- -8.64%
- YTD
- -13.04%
- 6M
- -12.14%
- 1Y
- 14.38%
- 3Y*
- 19.64%
- 5Y*
- 11.88%
- 10Y*
- 16.09%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DAFGX vs. TILIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DAFGX has a 1.37% expense ratio, which is higher than TILIX's 0.05% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DAFGX vs. TILIX — Risk / Return Rank
DAFGX
TILIX
DAFGX vs. TILIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dunham Focused Large Cap Growth Fund (DAFGX) and TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (TILIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DAFGX | TILIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.28 | 0.65 | -0.93 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.23 | 1.10 | -1.33 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.15 | -0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.34 | 0.67 | -1.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.95 | 2.32 | -3.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DAFGX | TILIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.28 | 0.65 | -0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 | 0.56 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | 0.77 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.56 | -0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between DAFGX and TILIX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
DAFGX vs. TILIX - Dividend Comparison
DAFGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.40%, more than TILIX's 5.07% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DAFGX Dunham Focused Large Cap Growth Fund | 20.40% | 16.51% | 0.00% | 2.40% | 0.00% | 8.61% | 2.31% | 3.33% | 8.90% | 0.95% | 0.00% | 0.58% |
TILIX TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | 5.07% | 4.41% | 3.25% | 1.90% | 11.00% | 8.76% | 1.91% | 2.38% | 4.01% | 0.68% | 1.33% | 1.32% |
Drawdowns
DAFGX vs. TILIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DAFGX drawdown since its inception was -47.69%, smaller than the maximum TILIX drawdown of -50.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAFGX and TILIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DAFGX | TILIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.69% | -50.54% | +2.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.70% | -16.24% | -11.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.69% | -32.68% | -15.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.69% | -32.68% | -15.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.80% | -16.24% | -15.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.41% | -7.77% | -1.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.94% | 4.73% | +5.21% |
Volatility
DAFGX vs. TILIX - Volatility Comparison
Dunham Focused Large Cap Growth Fund (DAFGX) has a higher volatility of 6.54% compared to TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (TILIX) at 5.34%. This indicates that DAFGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TILIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DAFGX | TILIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.54% | 5.34% | +1.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.55% | 11.80% | +2.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.39% | 22.35% | +2.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.15% | 21.44% | +4.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.31% | 21.01% | +4.30% |