DADS vs. HYDB
DADS (Digital Asset Debt Strategy ETF) and HYDB (iShares High Yield Systematic Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. DADS is actively managed, while HYDB is passively managed. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DADS charges 1.04%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for HYDB.
Performance
DADS vs. HYDB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DADS achieves a 7.44% return, which is significantly higher than HYDB's 1.75% return.
DADS
- 1D
- -1.81%
- 1M
- -6.89%
- 6M
- 0.37%
- YTD
- 7.44%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HYDB
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- 6M
- 1.32%
- YTD
- 1.75%
- 1Y
- 5.80%
- 3Y*
- 8.61%
- 5Y*
- 4.57%
- 10Y*
- —
DADS vs. HYDB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DADS Digital Asset Debt Strategy ETF | 7.44% | -3.21% |
HYDB iShares High Yield Systematic Bond ETF | 1.75% | 3.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between DADS and HYDB is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2025 | 0.51 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DADS vs. HYDB — Risk / Return Rank
DADS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
HYDB
DADS vs. HYDB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Digital Asset Debt Strategy ETF (DADS) and iShares High Yield Systematic Bond ETF (HYDB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DADS | HYDB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.29 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.06 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.08 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DADS vs. HYDB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DADS drawdown since its inception was -17.07%, smaller than the maximum HYDB drawdown of -21.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DADS and HYDB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DADS | HYDB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.07% | -21.58% | +4.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -5.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -14.28% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.67% | -0.11% | -8.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.31% | -2.36% | -4.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.64% | — |
Volatility
DADS vs. HYDB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DADS | HYDB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.72% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.03% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.64% | 3.79% | +13.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.64% | 7.05% | +10.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.64% | 7.72% | +9.92% |
DADS vs. HYDB - Expense Ratio Comparison
DADS has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than HYDB's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
DADS vs. HYDB - Dividend Comparison
DADS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.79%, less than HYDB's 6.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DADS Digital Asset Debt Strategy ETF | 4.79% | 1.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HYDB iShares High Yield Systematic Bond ETF | 6.97% | 7.04% | 6.95% | 7.00% | 6.30% | 4.70% | 5.81% | 5.68% | 6.16% | 2.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DADS and HYDB have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HYDB is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HYDB is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for DADS.
HYDB has the higher dividend yield at 6.97%, compared with 4.79% for DADS.
They also come from different issuers: Alphabit and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.04% for DADS and 0.35% for HYDB.
Find the right allocation for DADS and HYDB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer