D6RD.DE vs. QDVF.DE
D6RD.DE (Deka Future Energy ESG UCITS ETF) and QDVF.DE (iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both Energy Equities funds - D6RD.DE tracks the Solactive Future Energy ESG while QDVF.DE tracks the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Energy. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, D6RD.DE returned 9.84%/yr vs 13.74%/yr for QDVF.DE. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. D6RD.DE charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QDVF.DE.
Performance
D6RD.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, D6RD.DE achieves a 48.10% return, which is significantly higher than QDVF.DE's 32.71% return.
D6RD.DE
- 1D
- -2.87%
- 1M
- 13.40%
- YTD
- 48.10%
- 6M
- 49.56%
- 1Y
- 100.22%
- 3Y*
- 9.84%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QDVF.DE
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 4.38%
- YTD
- 32.71%
- 6M
- 28.30%
- 1Y
- 45.00%
- 3Y*
- 13.74%
- 5Y*
- 21.44%
- 10Y*
- 8.97%
D6RD.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D6RD.DE Deka Future Energy ESG UCITS ETF | 48.10% | 24.03% | -13.45% | -18.15% | -5.96% |
QDVF.DE iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) | 32.71% | -2.67% | 9.20% | -3.70% | 25.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between D6RD.DE and QDVF.DE is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2022 | 0.16 |
The correlation between D6RD.DE and QDVF.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
D6RD.DE vs. QDVF.DE — Risk / Return Rank
D6RD.DE
QDVF.DE
D6RD.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Deka Future Energy ESG UCITS ETF (D6RD.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVF.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| D6RD.DE | QDVF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.58 | 1.32 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 11.04 | 2.54 | +8.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 39.49 | 7.98 | +31.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| D6RD.DE | QDVF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.82 | 1.82 | +2.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.31 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.28 | -0.08 |
Drawdowns
D6RD.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum D6RD.DE drawdown since its inception was -59.57%, smaller than the maximum QDVF.DE drawdown of -65.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for D6RD.DE and QDVF.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| D6RD.DE | QDVF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.57% | -65.81% | +6.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.91% | -17.23% | +8.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.63% | -27.13% | -18.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -65.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.87% | -8.92% | +6.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.16% | -17.41% | -17.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.49% | 5.49% | -3.00% |
Volatility
D6RD.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Volatility Comparison
Deka Future Energy ESG UCITS ETF (D6RD.DE) has a higher volatility of 10.63% compared to iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVF.DE) at 7.70%. This indicates that D6RD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDVF.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| D6RD.DE | QDVF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.63% | 7.70% | +2.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.24% | 20.43% | -2.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.71% | 24.05% | +1.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.13% | 26.95% | -0.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.13% | 28.68% | -2.55% |
D6RD.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
D6RD.DE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than QDVF.DE's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
D6RD.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Dividend Comparison
D6RD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, while QDVF.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D6RD.DE Deka Future Energy ESG UCITS ETF | 0.34% | 0.59% | 0.72% | 0.81% | 0.08% |
QDVF.DE iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
D6RD.DE and QDVF.DE have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QDVF.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QDVF.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for D6RD.DE.
D6RD.DE tracks Solactive Future Energy ESG, while QDVF.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Energy. They also come from different issuers: Deka and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for D6RD.DE and 0.15% for QDVF.DE.
Find the right allocation for D6RD.DE and QDVF.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer