D6RD.DE vs. JMLP.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

D6RD.DE (Deka Future Energy ESG UCITS ETF) and JMLP.DE (HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - D6RD.DE tracks the Solactive Future Energy ESG while JMLP.DE tracks the Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, D6RD.DE returned 9.84%/yr vs 24.31%/yr for JMLP.DE. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. D6RD.DE charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for JMLP.DE.

Performance

D6RD.DE vs. JMLP.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Deka Future Energy ESG UCITS ETF (D6RD.DE) and HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF (JMLP.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, D6RD.DE achieves a 48.10% return, which is significantly higher than JMLP.DE's 27.39% return.

D6RD.DE

• 1D: -2.87%
• 1M: 13.40%
• YTD: 48.10%
• 6M: 49.56%
• 1Y: 100.22%
• 3Y*: 9.84%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

JMLP.DE

• 1D: -1.02%
• 1M: 3.28%
• YTD: 27.39%
• 6M: 23.64%
• 1Y: 25.58%
• 3Y*: 24.31%
• 5Y*: 23.96%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

D6RD.DE vs. JMLP.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
D6RD.DE Deka Future Energy ESG UCITS ETF	48.10%	24.03%	-13.45%	-18.15%	-5.96%
JMLP.DE HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF	27.39%	-5.93%	44.53%	15.63%	7.12%

Correlation

The correlation between D6RD.DE and JMLP.DE is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.06
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2022	0.22

The correlation between D6RD.DE and JMLP.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

D6RD.DE vs. JMLP.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

D6RD.DE

D6RD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 94
D6RD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
D6RD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
D6RD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 91
D6RD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
D6RD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 96

JMLP.DE

JMLP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 38
JMLP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
JMLP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
JMLP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 33
JMLP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
JMLP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

D6RD.DE vs. JMLP.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Deka Future Energy ESG UCITS ETF (D6RD.DE) and HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF (JMLP.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	D6RD.DE	JMLP.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.82	1.30	+2.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.58	1.81	+2.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.58	1.22	+0.36
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	11.04	2.22	+8.82
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	39.49	6.04	+33.45
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

D6RD.DE vs. JMLP.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current D6RD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 3.82, which is higher than the JMLP.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of D6RD.DE and JMLP.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	D6RD.DE	JMLP.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.82	1.30	+2.52
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.16	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.20	1.35	-1.15

Drawdowns

D6RD.DE vs. JMLP.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum D6RD.DE drawdown since its inception was -59.57%, which is greater than JMLP.DE's maximum drawdown of -22.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for D6RD.DE and JMLP.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	D6RD.DE	JMLP.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.57%	-22.29%	-37.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.91%	-11.02%	+2.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-45.63%	-22.29%	-23.34%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.29%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.87%	-5.15%	+2.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-35.16%	-5.87%	-29.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.49%	4.05%	-1.56%

Volatility

D6RD.DE vs. JMLP.DE - Volatility Comparison

Deka Future Energy ESG UCITS ETF (D6RD.DE) has a higher volatility of 10.63% compared to HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF (JMLP.DE) at 6.65%. This indicates that D6RD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JMLP.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	D6RD.DE	JMLP.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.63%	6.65%	+3.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.24%	15.30%	+2.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.71%	18.80%	+6.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.13%	20.38%	+5.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.13%	21.66%	+4.47%

D6RD.DE vs. JMLP.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

D6RD.DE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than JMLP.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

D6RD.DE vs. JMLP.DE - Dividend Comparison

D6RD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than JMLP.DE's 2.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
D6RD.DE Deka Future Energy ESG UCITS ETF	0.34%	0.59%	0.72%	0.81%	0.08%	0.00%	0.00%
JMLP.DE HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF	2.77%	3.38%	5.41%	11.39%	11.27%	14.07%	8.95%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both D6RD.DE and JMLP.DE in my portfolio?

D6RD.DE and JMLP.DE have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, D6RD.DE or JMLP.DE?

On fees, JMLP.DE is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, D6RD.DE or JMLP.DE?

JMLP.DE is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for D6RD.DE.

What is the main difference between D6RD.DE and JMLP.DE?

D6RD.DE tracks Solactive Future Energy ESG, while JMLP.DE tracks Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Deka and HANetf. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for D6RD.DE and 0.40% for JMLP.DE.