PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
D5BK.DE vs. EWT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

D5BK.DE vs. EWT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Europe Real Estate UCITS ETF 1C (D5BK.DE) and iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

D5BK.DE is traded in EUR, while EWT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EWT values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, D5BK.DE achieves a 1.25% return, which is significantly lower than EWT's 64.02% return. Over the past 10 years, D5BK.DE has underperformed EWT with an annualized return of 0.42%, while EWT has yielded a comparatively higher 19.18% annualized return.


D5BK.DE

1D
1.84%
1M
2.19%
YTD
1.25%
6M
4.38%
1Y
-0.90%
3Y*
7.63%
5Y*
-4.66%
10Y*
0.42%

EWT

1D
0.25%
1M
9.55%
YTD
64.02%
6M
69.93%
1Y
89.50%
3Y*
31.88%
5Y*
18.56%
10Y*
19.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

D5BK.DE vs. EWT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
D5BK.DE
Xtrackers FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Europe Real Estate UCITS ETF 1C
1.25%5.96%-4.03%15.92%-36.47%16.81%-10.27%29.66%-8.93%12.62%
EWT
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF
64.02%13.14%23.78%20.25%-24.49%35.62%20.66%36.37%-5.67%11.23%

Correlation

The correlation between D5BK.DE and EWT is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2010

0.29

The correlation between D5BK.DE and EWT shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (1 year) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

D5BK.DE vs. EWT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

D5BK.DE
D5BK.DE Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
D5BK.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
D5BK.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
D5BK.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
D5BK.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
D5BK.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

EWT
EWT Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
EWT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWT Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
EWT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWT Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

D5BK.DE vs. EWT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Europe Real Estate UCITS ETF 1C (D5BK.DE) and iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


D5BK.DEEWTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.59

-0.59

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.06

10.85

-10.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.14

28.55

-28.69

D5BK.DE vs. EWT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current D5BK.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.06, which is lower than the EWT Sharpe Ratio of 3.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of D5BK.DE and EWT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

D5BK.DE vs. EWT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum D5BK.DE drawdown since its inception was -46.42%, smaller than the maximum EWT drawdown of -57.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for D5BK.DE and EWT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


D5BK.DEEWTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.42%

-57.02%

+10.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.59%

-8.29%

-7.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.63%

-27.84%

+6.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.42%

-31.06%

-15.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.42%

-31.06%

-15.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.88%

-3.76%

-23.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.25%

-11.37%

-1.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.27%

3.15%

+3.12%

Volatility

D5BK.DE vs. EWT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Europe Real Estate UCITS ETF 1C (D5BK.DE) is 5.11%, while iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT) has a volatility of 12.70%. This indicates that D5BK.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


D5BK.DEEWTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.11%

12.70%

-7.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.34%

21.13%

-7.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.97%

25.46%

-9.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.54%

21.63%

-0.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.94%

21.07%

-1.13%

D5BK.DE vs. EWT - Expense Ratio Comparison

D5BK.DE has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than EWT's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

D5BK.DE vs. EWT - Dividend Comparison

D5BK.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EWT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.74%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
D5BK.DE
Xtrackers FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Europe Real Estate UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EWT
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF
2.74%4.43%3.32%8.12%18.82%0.55%1.83%2.49%3.16%2.81%2.39%3.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


D5BK.DE and EWT have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, D5BK.DE is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

D5BK.DE is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EWT.

D5BK.DE is categorized as REIT, while EWT is Asia Pacific Equities. D5BK.DE tracks FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Europe, while EWT tracks MSCI Taiwan Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for D5BK.DE and 0.59% for EWT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for D5BK.DE and EWT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer