PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
D5BK.DE vs. ACWI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

D5BK.DE vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Europe Real Estate UCITS ETF 1C (D5BK.DE) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

D5BK.DE is traded in EUR, while ACWI is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ACWI values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, D5BK.DE achieves a -0.60% return, which is significantly lower than ACWI's 13.75% return. Over the past 10 years, D5BK.DE has underperformed ACWI with an annualized return of -0.15%, while ACWI has yielded a comparatively higher 12.52% annualized return.


D5BK.DE

1D
0.72%
1M
-2.59%
YTD
-0.60%
6M
0.51%
1Y
-2.67%
3Y*
6.51%
5Y*
-4.66%
10Y*
-0.15%

ACWI

1D
0.00%
1M
3.58%
YTD
13.75%
6M
13.23%
1Y
27.72%
3Y*
17.90%
5Y*
12.38%
10Y*
12.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

D5BK.DE vs. ACWI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
D5BK.DE
Xtrackers FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Europe Real Estate UCITS ETF 1C
-0.60%5.96%-4.03%15.92%-36.63%17.10%-10.26%29.66%-8.93%12.62%
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
11.26%7.89%25.20%18.61%-13.33%27.54%6.75%29.45%-4.92%9.05%

Correlation

The correlation between D5BK.DE and ACWI is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2010

0.35

The correlation between D5BK.DE and ACWI shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (3 years) to 0.35 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

D5BK.DE vs. ACWI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

D5BK.DE
D5BK.DE Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
D5BK.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
D5BK.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
D5BK.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
D5BK.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
D5BK.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

ACWI
ACWI Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
ACWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWI Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWI Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

D5BK.DE vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Europe Real Estate UCITS ETF 1C (D5BK.DE) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


D5BK.DEACWIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.42

-0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.18

3.92

-4.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.45

16.36

-16.81

D5BK.DE vs. ACWI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current D5BK.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.17, which is lower than the ACWI Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of D5BK.DE and ACWI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


D5BK.DEACWIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.17

2.27

-2.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.21

0.82

-1.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.01

0.74

-0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.55

-0.28

Drawdowns

D5BK.DE vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum D5BK.DE drawdown since its inception was -46.41%, roughly equal to the maximum ACWI drawdown of -45.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for D5BK.DE and ACWI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


D5BK.DEACWIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.41%

-45.79%

-0.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.61%

-7.11%

-8.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.61%

-20.51%

-1.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.41%

-20.51%

-25.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.41%

-32.80%

-13.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.23%

-0.39%

-27.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.98%

-6.42%

-7.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.05%

1.70%

+4.35%

Volatility

D5BK.DE vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Europe Real Estate UCITS ETF 1C (D5BK.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.80% compared to iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) at 2.74%. This indicates that D5BK.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACWI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


D5BK.DEACWIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.80%

2.74%

+2.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.17%

9.28%

+3.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.75%

12.29%

+3.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.49%

15.11%

+6.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.95%

16.96%

+2.99%

D5BK.DE vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison

D5BK.DE has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

D5BK.DE vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison

D5BK.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ACWI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
1.42%1.55%1.70%1.88%1.79%1.71%1.43%2.33%2.18%1.94%2.19%2.56%
D5BK.DE
Xtrackers FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Europe Real Estate UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


D5BK.DE and ACWI have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ACWI is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ACWI is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for D5BK.DE.

D5BK.DE is categorized as REIT, while ACWI is Global Equities. D5BK.DE tracks FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Europe, while ACWI tracks MSCI All Country World Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for D5BK.DE and 0.32% for ACWI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for D5BK.DE and ACWI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer