PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CZOVX vs. NWAUX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CZOVX vs. NWAUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Zacks All-Cap Core Fund (CZOVX) and Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund (NWAUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CZOVX vs. NWAUX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CZOVX
Zacks All-Cap Core Fund
-2.89%15.61%24.75%23.62%-18.23%23.75%
NWAUX
Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund
9.49%-4.92%27.90%18.30%-3.23%22.65%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CZOVX achieves a -2.89% return, which is significantly lower than NWAUX's 9.49% return.


CZOVX

1D
2.88%
1M
-5.01%
YTD
-2.89%
6M
-1.28%
1Y
16.43%
3Y*
17.73%
5Y*
10.75%
10Y*
12.83%

NWAUX

1D
-0.20%
1M
-1.80%
YTD
9.49%
6M
7.91%
1Y
4.79%
3Y*
17.34%
5Y*
12.43%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CZOVX vs. NWAUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CZOVX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than NWAUX's 0.74% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CZOVX vs. NWAUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CZOVX
CZOVX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
CZOVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CZOVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
CZOVX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
CZOVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
CZOVX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

NWAUX
NWAUX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
NWAUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NWAUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
NWAUX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
NWAUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
NWAUX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CZOVX vs. NWAUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zacks All-Cap Core Fund (CZOVX) and Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund (NWAUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CZOVXNWAUXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.98

0.38

+0.60

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.48

0.59

+0.89

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.08

+0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.56

0.66

+0.91

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.19

1.53

+5.66

CZOVX vs. NWAUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CZOVX Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is higher than the NWAUX Sharpe Ratio of 0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CZOVX and NWAUX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CZOVXNWAUXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

0.38

+0.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.78

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

0.82

-0.07

Correlation

The correlation between CZOVX and NWAUX is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

CZOVX vs. NWAUX - Dividend Comparison

CZOVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.38%, less than NWAUX's 4.70% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CZOVX
Zacks All-Cap Core Fund
2.38%2.31%13.81%27.08%12.67%5.83%5.45%9.19%11.09%8.16%7.84%5.91%
NWAUX
Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund
4.70%4.35%13.58%0.40%1.93%0.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CZOVX vs. NWAUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CZOVX drawdown since its inception was -32.97%, which is greater than NWAUX's maximum drawdown of -21.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CZOVX and NWAUX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CZOVXNWAUXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.97%

-21.07%

-11.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.07%

-8.57%

-2.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.68%

-21.07%

-2.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.86%

-7.22%

+1.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.03%

-6.85%

+2.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.41%

3.83%

-1.42%

Volatility

CZOVX vs. NWAUX - Volatility Comparison

Zacks All-Cap Core Fund (CZOVX) has a higher volatility of 5.39% compared to Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund (NWAUX) at 2.74%. This indicates that CZOVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NWAUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CZOVXNWAUXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.39%

2.74%

+2.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.51%

7.29%

+2.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.35%

12.55%

+4.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.54%

16.10%

+0.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.60%

16.04%

+1.56%