PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CZOVX vs. AMIGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CZOVX vs. AMIGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Zacks All-Cap Core Fund (CZOVX) and Amana Growth Fund (AMIGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CZOVX achieves a 12.60% return, which is significantly lower than AMIGX's 17.52% return. Over the past 10 years, CZOVX has underperformed AMIGX with an annualized return of 14.41%, while AMIGX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.98% annualized return.


CZOVX

1D
0.42%
1M
5.50%
YTD
12.60%
6M
12.23%
1Y
28.41%
3Y*
21.86%
5Y*
13.13%
10Y*
14.41%

AMIGX

1D
0.93%
1M
7.91%
YTD
17.52%
6M
15.97%
1Y
37.94%
3Y*
22.14%
5Y*
14.72%
10Y*
17.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CZOVX vs. AMIGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CZOVX
Zacks All-Cap Core Fund
12.60%15.61%24.75%23.62%-18.23%29.23%15.24%29.34%-5.32%22.01%
AMIGX
Amana Growth Fund
17.52%17.89%16.01%26.00%-19.30%31.80%32.97%33.43%2.70%29.22%

Correlation

The correlation between CZOVX and AMIGX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.92

The correlation between CZOVX and AMIGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CZOVX vs. AMIGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CZOVX
CZOVX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
CZOVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CZOVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
CZOVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
CZOVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
CZOVX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

AMIGX
AMIGX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
AMIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
AMIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CZOVX vs. AMIGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zacks All-Cap Core Fund (CZOVX) and Amana Growth Fund (AMIGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CZOVXAMIGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.42

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.45

3.54

-0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.88

15.77

+0.11

CZOVX vs. AMIGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CZOVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is comparable to the AMIGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CZOVX and AMIGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CZOVXAMIGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.45

2.42

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.80

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

0.98

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.91

-0.09

Drawdowns

CZOVX vs. AMIGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CZOVX drawdown since its inception was -32.97%, which is greater than AMIGX's maximum drawdown of -27.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CZOVX and AMIGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CZOVXAMIGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.97%

-27.95%

-5.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.49%

-11.03%

+2.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.17%

-21.40%

+3.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.68%

-27.95%

+4.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.97%

-27.95%

-5.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.99%

-4.52%

+0.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.84%

2.47%

-0.63%

Volatility

CZOVX vs. AMIGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Zacks All-Cap Core Fund (CZOVX) is 3.07%, while Amana Growth Fund (AMIGX) has a volatility of 4.97%. This indicates that CZOVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMIGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CZOVXAMIGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.07%

4.97%

-1.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.20%

12.96%

-3.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.96%

16.09%

-4.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.54%

18.40%

-1.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.63%

18.43%

-0.80%

CZOVX vs. AMIGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CZOVX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than AMIGX's 0.67% expense ratio.


Dividends

CZOVX vs. AMIGX - Dividend Comparison

CZOVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%, more than AMIGX's 0.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMIGX
Amana Growth Fund
0.16%0.19%4.02%0.82%3.88%0.74%5.42%3.37%3.61%11.11%13.79%7.61%
CZOVX
Zacks All-Cap Core Fund
2.05%2.31%13.81%27.08%12.67%5.83%5.45%9.19%11.09%8.16%7.84%5.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


CZOVX and AMIGX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMIGX has higher volatility (4.97%) compared to CZOVX (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CZOVX dropped -32.97% vs AMIGX's -27.95%.

CZOVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 2.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CZOVX and AMIGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer