PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CZMSX vs. BDJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CZMSX vs. BDJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Multi-Manager Small Cap Equity Strategies Fund (CZMSX) and BlackRock Enhanced Equity Dividend Fund (BDJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CZMSX vs. BDJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CZMSX
Multi-Manager Small Cap Equity Strategies Fund
-2.48%1.55%8.55%15.65%-20.05%19.40%20.47%27.16%-10.77%14.84%
BDJ
BlackRock Enhanced Equity Dividend Fund
-7.23%26.12%16.87%-6.67%0.83%26.56%-7.58%37.43%-10.42%18.06%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CZMSX achieves a -2.48% return, which is significantly higher than BDJ's -7.23% return.


CZMSX

1D
-0.80%
1M
-7.95%
YTD
-2.48%
6M
-1.21%
1Y
10.40%
3Y*
6.45%
5Y*
1.18%
10Y*

BDJ

1D
2.01%
1M
-10.23%
YTD
-7.23%
6M
-0.27%
1Y
10.26%
3Y*
9.52%
5Y*
7.49%
10Y*
9.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CZMSX vs. BDJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CZMSX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than BDJ's 0.86% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CZMSX vs. BDJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CZMSX
CZMSX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
CZMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CZMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
CZMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
CZMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
CZMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

BDJ
BDJ Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
BDJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BDJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
BDJ Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
BDJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
BDJ Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CZMSX vs. BDJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Multi-Manager Small Cap Equity Strategies Fund (CZMSX) and BlackRock Enhanced Equity Dividend Fund (BDJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CZMSXBDJDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.44

0.62

-0.18

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.79

0.94

-0.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.14

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.54

0.79

-0.25

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.06

3.01

-0.95

CZMSX vs. BDJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CZMSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is comparable to the BDJ Sharpe Ratio of 0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CZMSX and BDJ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CZMSXBDJDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

0.62

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

0.47

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.30

-0.01

Correlation

The correlation between CZMSX and BDJ is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

CZMSX vs. BDJ - Dividend Comparison

CZMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.07%, less than BDJ's 9.93% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CZMSX
Multi-Manager Small Cap Equity Strategies Fund
9.07%8.85%3.05%2.04%10.31%17.14%0.31%5.75%7.94%7.88%0.00%0.00%
BDJ
BlackRock Enhanced Equity Dividend Fund
9.93%9.03%8.21%9.49%12.18%5.95%7.08%6.66%7.21%6.07%6.88%7.36%

Drawdowns

CZMSX vs. BDJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CZMSX drawdown since its inception was -40.96%, smaller than the maximum BDJ drawdown of -59.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CZMSX and BDJ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CZMSXBDJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.96%

-59.46%

+18.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.87%

-12.28%

-1.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.16%

-21.39%

-15.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.76%

-10.51%

-5.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.81%

-8.99%

-4.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.66%

3.24%

+0.42%

Volatility

CZMSX vs. BDJ - Volatility Comparison

Multi-Manager Small Cap Equity Strategies Fund (CZMSX) has a higher volatility of 5.85% compared to BlackRock Enhanced Equity Dividend Fund (BDJ) at 5.31%. This indicates that CZMSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CZMSXBDJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.85%

5.31%

+0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.70%

9.40%

+3.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.33%

16.63%

+5.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.90%

16.12%

+7.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.25%

18.38%

+5.87%