PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CZMSX vs. BDJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CZMSX vs. BDJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Multi-Manager Small Cap Equity Strategies Fund (CZMSX) and BlackRock Enhanced Equity Dividend Fund (BDJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CZMSX achieves a 13.97% return, which is significantly higher than BDJ's 0.25% return.


CZMSX

1D
0.52%
1M
3.80%
YTD
13.97%
6M
12.71%
1Y
24.05%
3Y*
11.81%
5Y*
3.72%
10Y*

BDJ

1D
0.22%
1M
1.45%
YTD
0.25%
6M
6.07%
1Y
17.25%
3Y*
13.78%
5Y*
6.76%
10Y*
10.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CZMSX vs. BDJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CZMSX
Multi-Manager Small Cap Equity Strategies Fund
13.97%1.55%8.55%15.65%-20.05%19.40%20.47%27.16%-10.77%14.84%
BDJ
BlackRock Enhanced Equity Dividend Fund
0.25%26.12%16.87%-6.67%0.83%26.56%-7.58%37.43%-10.42%18.06%

Correlation

The correlation between CZMSX and BDJ is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2017

0.67

The correlation between CZMSX and BDJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CZMSX vs. BDJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CZMSX
CZMSX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
CZMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CZMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
CZMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
CZMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
CZMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

BDJ
BDJ Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
BDJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BDJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
BDJ Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
BDJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
BDJ Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CZMSX vs. BDJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Multi-Manager Small Cap Equity Strategies Fund (CZMSX) and BlackRock Enhanced Equity Dividend Fund (BDJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CZMSXBDJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.25

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.63

1.41

+1.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.65

5.21

+3.45

CZMSX vs. BDJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CZMSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is comparable to the BDJ Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CZMSX and BDJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CZMSXBDJDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.48

1.45

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

0.42

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.31

+0.05

Drawdowns

CZMSX vs. BDJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CZMSX drawdown since its inception was -40.96%, smaller than the maximum BDJ drawdown of -59.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CZMSX and BDJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CZMSXBDJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.96%

-59.46%

+18.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.00%

-12.28%

+2.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.73%

-15.70%

-12.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.16%

-21.39%

-15.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.55%

-3.29%

+1.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.65%

-8.96%

-4.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.03%

3.32%

-0.29%

Volatility

CZMSX vs. BDJ - Volatility Comparison

Multi-Manager Small Cap Equity Strategies Fund (CZMSX) has a higher volatility of 4.67% compared to BlackRock Enhanced Equity Dividend Fund (BDJ) at 3.38%. This indicates that CZMSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CZMSXBDJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.67%

3.38%

+1.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.26%

9.32%

+2.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.79%

11.92%

+5.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.88%

16.17%

+7.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.14%

18.41%

+5.73%

CZMSX vs. BDJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CZMSX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than BDJ's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

CZMSX vs. BDJ - Dividend Comparison

CZMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.76%, less than BDJ's 9.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BDJ
BlackRock Enhanced Equity Dividend Fund
9.31%9.03%8.21%9.49%12.18%5.95%7.08%6.66%7.21%6.07%6.88%7.36%
CZMSX
Multi-Manager Small Cap Equity Strategies Fund
7.76%8.85%3.05%2.04%10.31%17.14%0.31%5.75%7.94%7.88%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CZMSX and BDJ have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CZMSX has higher volatility (4.67%) compared to BDJ (3.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CZMSX dropped -40.96% vs BDJ's -59.46%.

CZMSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CZMSX and BDJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer