CZMGX vs. FSPGX

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

CZMGX (Multi-Manager Growth Strategies Fund) and FSPGX (Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, CZMGX returned 13.66%/yr vs 15.46%/yr for FSPGX. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. CZMGX charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for FSPGX.

Performance

CZMGX vs. FSPGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Multi-Manager Growth Strategies Fund (CZMGX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CZMGX achieves a 9.32% return, which is significantly higher than FSPGX's 7.39% return.

CZMGX

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 3.65%
• YTD: 9.32%
• 6M: 8.24%
• 1Y: 24.55%
• 3Y*: 24.62%
• 5Y*: 13.66%
• 10Y*: —

FSPGX

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: 3.56%
• YTD: 7.39%
• 6M: 6.25%
• 1Y: 26.43%
• 3Y*: 25.11%
• 5Y*: 15.46%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CZMGX vs. FSPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CZMGX Multi-Manager Growth Strategies Fund	9.32%	15.18%	34.55%	41.78%	-29.41%	19.80%	33.39%	33.59%	-12.36%	25.10%
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund	7.39%	18.54%	33.27%	42.77%	-29.17%	27.57%	38.46%	36.38%	-1.79%	24.27%

Correlation

The correlation between CZMGX and FSPGX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.98
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.98
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.99
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2017	0.98

The correlation between CZMGX and FSPGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CZMGX vs. FSPGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CZMGX

CZMGX Risk / Return Rank: 25
CZMGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
CZMGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
CZMGX Omega Ratio Rank: 29
CZMGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
CZMGX Martin Ratio Rank: 19

FSPGX

FSPGX Risk / Return Rank: 29
FSPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
FSPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
FSPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
FSPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
FSPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CZMGX vs. FSPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Multi-Manager Growth Strategies Fund (CZMGX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CZMGX	FSPGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.51	1.66	-0.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.10	2.28	-0.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.29	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.44	1.59	-0.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.68	5.33	-0.65
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CZMGX vs. FSPGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CZMGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is comparable to the FSPGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CZMGX and FSPGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CZMGX	FSPGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.51	1.66	-0.15
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64	0.72	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.73	0.89	-0.16

Drawdowns

CZMGX vs. FSPGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CZMGX drawdown since its inception was -35.23%, which is greater than FSPGX's maximum drawdown of -32.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CZMGX and FSPGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CZMGX	FSPGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.23%	-32.66%	-2.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.55%	-16.17%	-0.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.71%	-23.32%	+0.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.23%	-32.66%	-2.57%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.86%	-1.49%	+0.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.58%	-6.37%	-1.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.07%	4.81%	+0.26%

Volatility

CZMGX vs. FSPGX - Volatility Comparison

Multi-Manager Growth Strategies Fund (CZMGX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) have volatilities of 3.58% and 3.67%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CZMGX	FSPGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.58%	3.67%	-0.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.82%	11.65%	+0.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.71%	15.44%	+0.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.52%	21.49%	+0.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.83%	21.55%	+0.28%

CZMGX vs. FSPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CZMGX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPGX's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

CZMGX vs. FSPGX - Dividend Comparison

CZMGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FSPGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CZMGX Multi-Manager Growth Strategies Fund	0.00%	11.02%	10.86%	5.59%	10.39%	15.19%	5.04%	5.53%	6.87%	4.66%
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund	0.32%	0.34%	0.37%	0.73%	0.86%	2.22%	1.76%	1.04%	1.32%	0.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CZMGX and FSPGX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.98, CZMGX and FSPGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, CZMGX or FSPGX?

FSPGX has higher volatility (3.67%) compared to CZMGX (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CZMGX dropped -35.23% vs FSPGX's -32.66%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSPGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.