CZAR vs. SPAM

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Themes Natural Monopoly ETF (CZAR) and Themes Cybersecurity ETF (SPAM).

CZAR and SPAM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CZAR is a passively managed fund by Themes that tracks the performance of the Solactive Natural Monopoly Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Dec 12, 2023. SPAM is a passively managed fund by Themes that tracks the performance of the Solactive Cyber Security Index - Benchmark TR Net. It was launched on Dec 7, 2023. Both CZAR and SPAM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

CZAR vs. SPAM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Themes Natural Monopoly ETF (CZAR) and Themes Cybersecurity ETF (SPAM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CZAR vs. SPAM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CZAR Themes Natural Monopoly ETF	-4.66%	13.32%	10.92%	2.34%
SPAM Themes Cybersecurity ETF	-5.88%	4.86%	10.58%	1.66%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CZAR achieves a -4.66% return, which is significantly higher than SPAM's -5.88% return.

CZAR

• 1D: 1.90%
• 1M: -4.94%
• YTD: -4.66%
• 6M: -4.96%
• 1Y: 5.58%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SPAM

• 1D: 3.78%
• 1M: 0.69%
• YTD: -5.88%
• 6M: -17.32%
• 1Y: 1.94%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CZAR vs. SPAM - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CZAR and SPAM have an expense ratio of 0.35%.

CZAR

Themes Natural Monopoly ETF

SPAM

Themes Cybersecurity ETF

Return for Risk

CZAR vs. SPAM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CZAR

CZAR Risk / Return Rank: 23
CZAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
CZAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
CZAR Omega Ratio Rank: 22
CZAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
CZAR Martin Ratio Rank: 25

SPAM

SPAM Risk / Return Rank: 13
SPAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
SPAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
SPAM Omega Ratio Rank: 14
SPAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
SPAM Martin Ratio Rank: 12

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CZAR vs. SPAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Natural Monopoly ETF (CZAR) and Themes Cybersecurity ETF (SPAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CZAR	SPAM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.35	0.07	+0.28
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.60	0.29	+0.32
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.04	+0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.54	0.01	+0.53
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.93	0.02	+1.91
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CZAR vs. SPAM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CZAR Sharpe Ratio is 0.35, which is higher than the SPAM Sharpe Ratio of 0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CZAR and SPAM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CZAR	SPAM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.35	0.07	+0.28
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.61	0.27	+0.35

Correlation

The correlation between CZAR and SPAM is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

CZAR vs. SPAM - Dividend Comparison

CZAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%, more than SPAM's 0.52% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024
CZAR Themes Natural Monopoly ETF	1.54%	1.47%	0.94%
SPAM Themes Cybersecurity ETF	0.52%	0.49%	0.13%

Drawdowns

CZAR vs. SPAM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CZAR drawdown since its inception was -13.38%, smaller than the maximum SPAM drawdown of -24.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CZAR and SPAM.

Drawdown Indicators

	CZAR	SPAM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.38%	-24.02%	+10.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.29%	-24.02%	+13.73%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.30%	-20.11%	+12.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.06%	-6.37%	+4.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.87%	9.78%	-6.91%

Volatility

CZAR vs. SPAM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Themes Natural Monopoly ETF (CZAR) is 4.80%, while Themes Cybersecurity ETF (SPAM) has a volatility of 8.04%. This indicates that CZAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPAM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CZAR	SPAM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.80%	8.04%	-3.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.72%	19.15%	-9.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.91%	26.80%	-10.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.26%	23.51%	-8.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.26%	23.51%	-8.25%