CYSE.L vs. QWTM.L
CYSE.L (WisdomTree Cybersecurity UCITS ETF USD Acc) and QWTM.L (WisdomTree Quantum Computing UCITS ETF - USD Acc) are both Technology Equities funds from WisdomTree - CYSE.L tracks the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD while QWTM.L tracks the WisdomTree Classiq Quantum Computing UCITS Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CYSE.L charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for QWTM.L.
Performance
CYSE.L vs. QWTM.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CYSE.L achieves a 24.45% return, which is significantly lower than QWTM.L's 51.52% return.
CYSE.L
- 1D
- -1.44%
- 1M
- 26.86%
- YTD
- 24.45%
- 6M
- 17.83%
- 1Y
- 12.00%
- 3Y*
- 18.44%
- 5Y*
- 10.59%
- 10Y*
- —
QWTM.L
- 1D
- -1.88%
- 1M
- 20.99%
- YTD
- 51.52%
- 6M
- 41.90%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CYSE.L vs. QWTM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CYSE.L WisdomTree Cybersecurity UCITS ETF USD Acc | 24.45% | -6.97% |
QWTM.L WisdomTree Quantum Computing UCITS ETF - USD Acc | 51.52% | 19.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between CYSE.L and QWTM.L is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2025 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CYSE.L vs. QWTM.L — Risk / Return Rank
CYSE.L
QWTM.L
CYSE.L vs. QWTM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Cybersecurity UCITS ETF USD Acc (CYSE.L) and WisdomTree Quantum Computing UCITS ETF - USD Acc (QWTM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CYSE.L | QWTM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.38 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.87 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CYSE.L | QWTM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 3.11 | -2.87 |
Drawdowns
CYSE.L vs. QWTM.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CYSE.L drawdown since its inception was -46.58%, which is greater than QWTM.L's maximum drawdown of -23.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CYSE.L and QWTM.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CYSE.L | QWTM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.58% | -23.74% | -22.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.22% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.88% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.84% | -4.22% | -0.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.16% | -10.21% | -8.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.71% | — | — |
Volatility
CYSE.L vs. QWTM.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CYSE.L | QWTM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.86% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.40% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.03% | 39.18% | -7.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.30% | 39.18% | -7.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.34% | 39.18% | -7.84% |
CYSE.L vs. QWTM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CYSE.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than QWTM.L's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
CYSE.L vs. QWTM.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CYSE.L nor QWTM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CYSE.L WisdomTree Cybersecurity UCITS ETF USD Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.24% |
QWTM.L WisdomTree Quantum Computing UCITS ETF - USD Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CYSE.L and QWTM.L have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CYSE.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CYSE.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for QWTM.L.
CYSE.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while QWTM.L tracks WisdomTree Classiq Quantum Computing UCITS Index. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for CYSE.L and 0.50% for QWTM.L.
Find the right allocation for CYSE.L and QWTM.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer