CYN.L vs. GPM.L
CYN.L (CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income plc) and GPM.L (Golden Prospect Precious Metals Ltd) are both stocks. Both operate in the Asset Management industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 10 years, CYN.L returned 20.88%/yr vs 12.85%/yr for GPM.L. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CYN.L vs. GPM.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CYN.L achieves a 9.44% return, which is significantly lower than GPM.L's 20.74% return. Over the past 10 years, CYN.L has outperformed GPM.L with an annualized return of 20.88%, while GPM.L has yielded a comparatively lower 12.85% annualized return.
CYN.L
- 1D
- -1.06%
- 1M
- -8.00%
- YTD
- 9.44%
- 6M
- 20.66%
- 1Y
- 97.39%
- 3Y*
- 36.00%
- 5Y*
- 21.38%
- 10Y*
- 20.88%
GPM.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 4.61%
- YTD
- 20.74%
- 6M
- 31.21%
- 1Y
- 95.02%
- 3Y*
- 52.90%
- 5Y*
- 13.79%
- 10Y*
- 12.85%
CYN.L vs. GPM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CYN.L CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income plc | 9.44% | 101.77% | 16.77% | -11.97% | 30.32% | 30.33% | 53.89% | 5.38% | -23.71% | 0.94% |
GPM.L Golden Prospect Precious Metals Ltd | 20.74% | 164.79% | 20.34% | -14.24% | -19.06% | -20.56% | 69.84% | 77.46% | -44.09% | -14.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between CYN.L and GPM.L is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2006 | 0.14 |
Over the past year, CYN.L and GPM.L have become more correlated (0.56) than their long-term average of 0.14, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
CYN.L:
£184.83M
GPM.L:
£111.43M
CYN.L:
£1.09
GPM.L:
£0.91
CYN.L:
3.43
GPM.L:
1.25
CYN.L:
21.71
GPM.L:
1.35
CYN.L:
1.49
GPM.L:
0.89
CYN.L:
£9.81M
GPM.L:
£79.15M
CYN.L:
£17.09M
GPM.L:
£79.06M
CYN.L:
£64.77M
GPM.L:
£85.71M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CYN.L vs. GPM.L — Risk / Return Rank
CYN.L
GPM.L
CYN.L vs. GPM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income plc (CYN.L) and Golden Prospect Precious Metals Ltd (GPM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CYN.L | GPM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.35 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.24 | 3.97 | +0.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.11 | 9.07 | +3.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CYN.L | GPM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.64 | 2.23 | +0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | 0.35 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 | 0.32 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.01 | +0.30 |
Drawdowns
CYN.L vs. GPM.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CYN.L drawdown since its inception was -79.15%, smaller than the maximum GPM.L drawdown of -86.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CYN.L and GPM.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CYN.L | GPM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.15% | -86.38% | +7.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.95% | -27.61% | +4.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.95% | -27.61% | +4.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.36% | -61.02% | +25.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.32% | -68.79% | +9.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.32% | -10.95% | -2.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.96% | -59.10% | +27.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.05% | 12.10% | -4.05% |
Volatility
CYN.L vs. GPM.L - Volatility Comparison
CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income plc (CYN.L) and Golden Prospect Precious Metals Ltd (GPM.L) have volatilities of 8.98% and 9.16%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CYN.L | GPM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.98% | 9.16% | -0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.74% | 32.86% | -5.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.94% | 49.10% | -12.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.52% | 39.19% | -7.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.89% | 39.67% | -12.78% |
Dividends
CYN.L vs. GPM.L - Dividend Comparison
CYN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.86%, while GPM.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CYN.L CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income plc | 6.86% | 3.60% | 3.55% | 5.21% | 2.85% | 3.60% | 4.52% | 6.50% | 6.89% | 4.65% | 4.48% | 6.83% |
GPM.L Golden Prospect Precious Metals Ltd | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
CYN.L vs. GPM.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income plc and Golden Prospect Precious Metals Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
CYN.L and GPM.L have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CYN.L and GPM.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer