CYGB.L vs. FVUG.L
CYGB.L (iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)) and FVUG.L (Franklin Sustainable Euro Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - CYGB.L is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg China Treasury + Policy Bank Index, while FVUG.L is a Green Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Global Aggregate EUR Green Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CYGB.L returned 5.42%/yr vs -2.37%/yr for FVUG.L. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CYGB.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FVUG.L.
Performance
CYGB.L vs. FVUG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CYGB.L achieves a 3.44% return, which is significantly higher than FVUG.L's -2.11% return.
CYGB.L
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- 6M
- 3.08%
- YTD
- 3.44%
- 1Y
- 3.67%
- 3Y*
- 6.63%
- 5Y*
- 5.42%
- 10Y*
- —
FVUG.L
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -2.44%
- 6M
- -1.83%
- YTD
- -2.11%
- 1Y
- -0.54%
- 3Y*
- 2.65%
- 5Y*
- -2.37%
- 10Y*
- —
CYGB.L vs. FVUG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CYGB.L iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) | 3.44% | 2.20% | 11.38% | 7.14% | 2.11% | 2.84% |
FVUG.L Franklin Sustainable Euro Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) | -2.11% | 5.85% | -1.90% | 5.64% | -14.50% | -3.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between CYGB.L and FVUG.L is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2021 | 0.07 |
The correlation between CYGB.L and FVUG.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.08 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CYGB.L vs. FVUG.L — Risk / Return Rank
CYGB.L
FVUG.L
CYGB.L vs. FVUG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (CYGB.L) and Franklin Sustainable Euro Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (FVUG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CYGB.L | FVUG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 0.99 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.28 | -0.12 | +5.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.15 | -0.28 | +12.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CYGB.L vs. FVUG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CYGB.L drawdown since its inception was -1.56%, smaller than the maximum FVUG.L drawdown of -27.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CYGB.L and FVUG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CYGB.L | FVUG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.56% | -27.48% | +25.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.69% | -4.51% | +3.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.56% | -5.06% | +3.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -1.56% | -22.03% | +20.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.17% | -18.61% | +18.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.24% | -15.96% | +15.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.29% | 1.92% | -1.63% |
Volatility
CYGB.L vs. FVUG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (CYGB.L) is 0.59%, while Franklin Sustainable Euro Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (FVUG.L) has a volatility of 1.40%. This indicates that CYGB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FVUG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CYGB.L | FVUG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.59% | 1.40% | -0.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.24% | 3.88% | -1.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.72% | 4.97% | -2.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.38% | 6.81% | -4.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.33% | 9.03% | -6.70% |
CYGB.L vs. FVUG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CYGB.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than FVUG.L's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
CYGB.L vs. FVUG.L - Dividend Comparison
CYGB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, while FVUG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CYGB.L iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) | 1.70% | 1.84% | 2.13% | 2.38% | 2.68% | 2.21% |
FVUG.L Franklin Sustainable Euro Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CYGB.L and FVUG.L have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FVUG.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FVUG.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for CYGB.L.
CYGB.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while FVUG.L is Green Bonds. CYGB.L tracks Bloomberg China Treasury + Policy Bank Index, while FVUG.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate EUR Green Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for CYGB.L and 0.25% for FVUG.L.
Find the right allocation for CYGB.L and FVUG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer