PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FVUG.L vs. FLRG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FVUG.L vs. FLRG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Franklin Sustainable Euro Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (FVUG.L) and Franklin Sustainable Euro Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (FLRG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FVUG.L is traded in GBP, while FLRG.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the FLRG.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FVUG.L achieves a -2.28% return, which is significantly lower than FLRG.L's -1.53% return.


FVUG.L

1D
-0.71%
1M
-2.23%
6M
-2.05%
YTD
-2.28%
1Y
-0.85%
3Y*
2.92%
5Y*
-2.41%
10Y*

FLRG.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.74%
6M
-1.42%
YTD
-1.53%
1Y
-0.26%
3Y*
3.10%
5Y*
-2.20%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FVUG.L vs. FLRG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FVUG.L
Franklin Sustainable Euro Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
-2.28%5.85%-1.90%5.64%-14.50%-9.35%11.32%-11.93%
FLRG.L
Franklin Sustainable Euro Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
-1.53%5.97%-1.90%5.56%-14.81%-8.76%11.42%2.11%

Correlation

The correlation between FVUG.L and FLRG.L is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2019

0.89

The correlation between FVUG.L and FLRG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FVUG.L vs. FLRG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FVUG.L
FVUG.L Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
FVUG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FVUG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
FVUG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
FVUG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
FVUG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

FLRG.L
FLRG.L Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
FLRG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLRG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLRG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
FLRG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLRG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FVUG.L vs. FLRG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Sustainable Euro Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (FVUG.L) and Franklin Sustainable Euro Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (FLRG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FVUG.LFLRG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

0.99

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.20

-0.10

-0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.45

-0.21

-0.25

FVUG.L vs. FLRG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FVUG.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.17, which is lower than the FLRG.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FVUG.L and FLRG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FVUG.L vs. FLRG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FVUG.L drawdown since its inception was -27.48%, roughly equal to the maximum FLRG.L drawdown of -26.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVUG.L and FLRG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FVUG.LFLRG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.48%

-26.99%

-0.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.35%

-3.78%

-0.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.06%

-4.90%

-0.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.03%

-21.56%

-0.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.75%

-18.18%

-0.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.96%

-15.29%

-0.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

1.77%

+0.11%

Volatility

FVUG.L vs. FLRG.L - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Sustainable Euro Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (FVUG.L) has a higher volatility of 1.38% compared to Franklin Sustainable Euro Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (FLRG.L) at 1.31%. This indicates that FVUG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLRG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FVUG.LFLRG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.38%

1.31%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.87%

3.79%

+0.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.96%

5.03%

-0.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.81%

6.77%

+0.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.04%

7.20%

+1.84%

FVUG.L vs. FLRG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FVUG.L and FLRG.L have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FVUG.L vs. FLRG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither FVUG.L nor FLRG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


FVUG.L and FLRG.L have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FVUG.L and FLRG.L have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

Both ETFs track Franklin Sustainable Euro Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc).

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FVUG.L and FLRG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer