CYBE.AS vs. PPFB.DE
CYBE.AS (iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc) and PPFB.DE (iShares Physical Gold ETC) are both exchange-traded funds - CYBE.AS is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg China Treasury + Policy Bank Index, while PPFB.DE is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Gold. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CYBE.AS returned 5.12%/yr vs 28.05%/yr for PPFB.DE. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CYBE.AS charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for PPFB.DE.
Performance
CYBE.AS vs. PPFB.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CYBE.AS achieves a 1.79% return, which is significantly lower than PPFB.DE's 2.74% return.
CYBE.AS
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.63%
- YTD
- 1.79%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 1.75%
- 3Y*
- 5.12%
- 5Y*
- 3.85%
- 10Y*
- —
PPFB.DE
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- -1.58%
- YTD
- 2.74%
- 6M
- 6.39%
- 1Y
- 30.20%
- 3Y*
- 28.05%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CYBE.AS vs. PPFB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CYBE.AS iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc | 1.79% | 0.34% | 10.03% | 5.64% | 0.42% | 0.74% |
PPFB.DE iShares Physical Gold ETC | 2.74% | 49.11% | 34.17% | 9.42% | 7.03% | 3.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between CYBE.AS and PPFB.DE is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2021 | 0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CYBE.AS vs. PPFB.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CYBE.AS
PPFB.DE
CYBE.AS vs. PPFB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc (CYBE.AS) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CYBE.AS | PPFB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.26 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.58 | 1.81 | -0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.03 | 4.60 | -1.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CYBE.AS | PPFB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 | 1.30 | -0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.77 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.78 | 1.26 | +0.52 |
Drawdowns
CYBE.AS vs. PPFB.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CYBE.AS drawdown since its inception was -1.81%, smaller than the maximum PPFB.DE drawdown of -16.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CYBE.AS and PPFB.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CYBE.AS | PPFB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.81% | -16.60% | +14.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.09% | -16.60% | +15.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.81% | -16.60% | +14.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -1.81% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.62% | -15.00% | +14.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.42% | -4.40% | +3.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.58% | 6.55% | -5.97% |
Volatility
CYBE.AS vs. PPFB.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc (CYBE.AS) is 1.41%, while iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE) has a volatility of 5.11%. This indicates that CYBE.AS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PPFB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CYBE.AS | PPFB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.41% | 5.11% | -3.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.16% | 20.18% | -18.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.51% | 23.12% | -20.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.22% | 16.13% | -13.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.20% | 16.13% | -13.93% |
CYBE.AS vs. PPFB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CYBE.AS has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than PPFB.DE's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
CYBE.AS vs. PPFB.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CYBE.AS nor PPFB.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CYBE.AS and PPFB.DE have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PPFB.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PPFB.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for CYBE.AS.
CYBE.AS is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while PPFB.DE is Precious Metals. CYBE.AS tracks Bloomberg China Treasury + Policy Bank Index, while PPFB.DE tracks Gold. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for CYBE.AS and 0.12% for PPFB.DE.
Find the right allocation for CYBE.AS and PPFB.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer