PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CXRN vs. TAXM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CXRN vs. TAXM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF (CXRN) and BondBloxx IR+M Tax-Aware ETF for Massachusetts Residents (TAXM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CXRN achieves a -21.39% return, which is significantly lower than TAXM's 1.31% return.


CXRN

1D
-0.21%
1M
-21.84%
YTD
-21.39%
6M
-23.62%
1Y
-27.23%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TAXM

1D
-0.12%
1M
1.14%
YTD
1.31%
6M
1.47%
1Y
5.91%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CXRN vs. TAXM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CXRN and TAXM is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2025

-0.16

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CXRN vs. TAXM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CXRN
CXRN Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
CXRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CXRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
CXRN Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
CXRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
CXRN Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

TAXM
TAXM Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
TAXM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TAXM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
TAXM Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
TAXM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
TAXM Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CXRN vs. TAXM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF (CXRN) and BondBloxx IR+M Tax-Aware ETF for Massachusetts Residents (TAXM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CXRNTAXMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

1.46

-0.57

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.94

2.20

-3.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-2.21

7.51

-9.73

CXRN vs. TAXM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CXRN Sharpe Ratio is -0.76, which is lower than the TAXM Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CXRN and TAXM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CXRN vs. TAXM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CXRN drawdown since its inception was -51.11%, which is greater than TAXM's maximum drawdown of -3.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CXRN and TAXM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CXRNTAXMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.11%

-3.10%

-48.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.97%

-2.70%

-26.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-51.11%

-0.67%

-50.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.67%

-0.71%

-29.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.34%

0.79%

+11.55%

Volatility

CXRN vs. TAXM - Volatility Comparison

Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF (CXRN) has a higher volatility of 9.67% compared to BondBloxx IR+M Tax-Aware ETF for Massachusetts Residents (TAXM) at 0.69%. This indicates that CXRN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TAXM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CXRNTAXMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.67%

0.69%

+8.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.05%

2.08%

+24.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.39%

2.66%

+33.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.73%

3.51%

+33.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.73%

3.51%

+33.22%

CXRN vs. TAXM - Expense Ratio Comparison

CXRN has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than TAXM's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

CXRN vs. TAXM - Dividend Comparison

CXRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, less than TAXM's 3.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
CXRN
Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF
2.87%3.30%0.13%
TAXM
BondBloxx IR+M Tax-Aware ETF for Massachusetts Residents
3.28%2.75%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CXRN and TAXM have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CXRN has higher volatility (9.67%) compared to TAXM (0.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CXRN dropped -51.11% vs TAXM's -3.10%.

On 1-year performance, TAXM leads with 5.91% vs -27.23% for CXRN. On fees, TAXM is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, TAXM has been the lower-risk option at 0.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TAXM has performed better with a 5.91% return vs -27.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TAXM is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for CXRN.

TAXM has the higher dividend yield at 3.28%, compared with 2.87% for CXRN.

CXRN is categorized as Leveraged Commodities, while TAXM is Municipal Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Teucrium and BondBloxx. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for CXRN and 0.35% for TAXM.

TAXM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs -0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CXRN and TAXM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer