CXRN vs. QHY
CXRN (Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF) and QHY (WisdomTree U.S. Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - CXRN is a Leveraged Commodities fund actively managed by Teucrium, while QHY is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. High Yield Corporate Bond Index. CXRN is actively managed, while QHY is passively managed. Over the past year, CXRN returned -25.61% vs 7.04% for QHY. At a correlation of -0.14, they often move in opposite directions. CXRN charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for QHY.
Performance
CXRN vs. QHY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CXRN achieves a -16.09% return, which is significantly lower than QHY's 1.51% return.
CXRN
- 1D
- -3.08%
- 1M
- -22.43%
- YTD
- -16.09%
- 6M
- -18.12%
- 1Y
- -25.61%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QHY
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- YTD
- 1.51%
- 6M
- 1.74%
- 1Y
- 7.04%
- 3Y*
- 8.17%
- 5Y*
- 3.22%
- 10Y*
- 4.96%
CXRN vs. QHY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CXRN Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF | -16.09% | -25.68% | 7.40% |
QHY WisdomTree U.S. Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund | 1.51% | 9.61% | -0.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between CXRN and QHY is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2024 | -0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CXRN vs. QHY — Risk / Return Rank
CXRN
QHY
CXRN vs. QHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF (CXRN) and WisdomTree U.S. Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund (QHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CXRN | QHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.38 | -0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.96 | 2.55 | -3.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.82 | 11.61 | -13.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CXRN | QHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.71 | 1.95 | -2.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.65 | 0.61 | -1.27 |
Drawdowns
CXRN vs. QHY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CXRN drawdown since its inception was -47.82%, which is greater than QHY's maximum drawdown of -22.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CXRN and QHY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CXRN | QHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.82% | -22.74% | -25.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.83% | -2.77% | -24.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -4.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -22.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.82% | -0.03% | -47.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.13% | -2.75% | -27.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.07% | 0.61% | +13.46% |
Volatility
CXRN vs. QHY - Volatility Comparison
Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF (CXRN) has a higher volatility of 15.47% compared to WisdomTree U.S. Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund (QHY) at 1.07%. This indicates that CXRN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CXRN | QHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.47% | 1.07% | +14.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.83% | 2.86% | +23.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.45% | 3.64% | +32.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.94% | 7.57% | +29.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.94% | 8.20% | +28.74% |
CXRN vs. QHY - Expense Ratio Comparison
CXRN has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than QHY's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
CXRN vs. QHY - Dividend Comparison
CXRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, less than QHY's 6.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CXRN Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF | 2.69% | 3.30% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QHY WisdomTree U.S. Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund | 6.25% | 6.26% | 6.40% | 6.11% | 5.44% | 4.09% | 4.80% | 5.21% | 5.93% | 6.47% | 4.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CXRN and QHY have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CXRN has higher volatility (15.47%) compared to QHY (1.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CXRN dropped -47.82% vs QHY's -22.74%.
On 1-year performance, QHY leads with 7.04% vs -25.61% for CXRN. On fees, QHY is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, QHY has been the lower-risk option at 1.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QHY has performed better with a 7.04% return vs -25.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QHY is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for CXRN.
QHY has the higher dividend yield at 6.25%, compared with 2.69% for CXRN.
CXRN is categorized as Leveraged Commodities, while QHY is High Yield Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Teucrium and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for CXRN and 0.38% for QHY.
QHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CXRN and QHY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer