CXRN vs. IBTH
CXRN (Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF) and IBTH (iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Treasury ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CXRN is a Leveraged Commodities fund actively managed by Teucrium, while IBTH is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2027 Maturity US Treasury Index. CXRN is actively managed, while IBTH is passively managed. Over the past year, CXRN returned -7.33% vs 3.20% for IBTH. Their -0.12 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. CXRN charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for IBTH.
Performance
CXRN vs. IBTH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CXRN achieves a -13.17% return, which is significantly lower than IBTH's 1.39% return.
CXRN
- 1D
- -2.07%
- 1M
- 8.11%
- 6M
- -7.88%
- YTD
- -13.17%
- 1Y
- -7.33%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -20.15%
IBTH
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- 6M
- 1.14%
- YTD
- 1.39%
- 1Y
- 3.20%
- 3Y*
- 4.41%
- 5Y*
- 0.30%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 0.68%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $59.75K | $98.55K | $292.18K | |
| $7.80M | $10.08M | $10.08M |
CXRN vs. IBTH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CXRN Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF | -13.17% | -25.68% | 7.40% |
IBTH iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Treasury ETF | 1.39% | 5.29% | 0.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between CXRN and IBTH is -0.24, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2024 | -0.12 |
The correlation between CXRN and IBTH shifts across timeframes, from -0.24 (1 year) to -0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CXRN vs. IBTH — Risk / Return Rank
CXRN
IBTH
CXRN vs. IBTH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF (CXRN) and iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Treasury ETF (IBTH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CXRN | IBTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -7.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.99 | -1.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.30 | 9.81 | -10.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.83 | 43.35 | -44.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CXRN vs. IBTH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CXRN drawdown since its inception was -53.17%, which is greater than IBTH's maximum drawdown of -16.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CXRN and IBTH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CXRN | IBTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.17% | -16.16% | -37.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.96% | -0.38% | -31.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -1.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -14.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -46.00% | -0.90% | -45.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.70% | -6.57% | -25.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.66% | 0.09% | +11.57% |
Volatility
CXRN vs. IBTH - Volatility Comparison
Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF (CXRN) has a higher volatility of 15.18% compared to iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Treasury ETF (IBTH) at 0.21%. This indicates that CXRN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBTH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CXRN | IBTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.18% | 0.21% | +14.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.46% | 0.59% | +28.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.65% | 0.99% | +36.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.12% | 4.15% | +33.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.12% | 4.15% | +33.97% |
CXRN vs. IBTH - Expense Ratio Comparison
CXRN has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than IBTH's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
CXRN vs. IBTH - Dividend Comparison
CXRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.38%, less than IBTH's 3.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CXRN Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF | 2.38% | 3.30% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IBTH iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Treasury ETF | 3.47% | 3.92% | 4.04% | 3.61% | 2.00% | 0.77% | 0.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CXRN and IBTH have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CXRN has higher volatility (15.18%) compared to IBTH (0.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CXRN dropped -53.17% vs IBTH's -16.16%.
On 1-year performance, IBTH leads with 3.20% vs -7.33% for CXRN. On fees, IBTH is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, IBTH has been the lower-risk option at 0.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IBTH has performed better with a 3.20% return vs -7.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBTH is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for CXRN.
IBTH has the higher dividend yield at 3.47%, compared with 2.38% for CXRN.
CXRN is categorized as Leveraged Commodities, while IBTH is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Teucrium and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for CXRN and 0.07% for IBTH.
IBTH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.79 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CXRN and IBTH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer