CXRN vs. AOHY
CXRN (Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF) and AOHY (Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CXRN is a Leveraged Commodities fund actively managed by Teucrium, while AOHY is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by Angel Oak. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CXRN returned -7.33% vs 5.54% for AOHY. Their -0.11 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. CXRN charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for AOHY.
Performance
CXRN vs. AOHY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CXRN achieves a -13.17% return, which is significantly lower than AOHY's 2.58% return.
CXRN
- 1D
- -2.07%
- 1M
- 8.11%
- 6M
- -7.88%
- YTD
- -13.17%
- 1Y
- -7.33%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -20.15%
AOHY
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.06%
- 6M
- 1.70%
- YTD
- 2.58%
- 1Y
- 5.54%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.34%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $518.47K | $498.47K | $466.80K | |
| $59.75K | $98.55K | $292.18K |
CXRN vs. AOHY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CXRN Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF | -13.17% | -25.68% | 7.40% |
AOHY Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities ETF | 2.58% | 7.62% | -0.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between CXRN and AOHY is -0.11, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2024 | -0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CXRN vs. AOHY — Risk / Return Rank
CXRN
AOHY
CXRN vs. AOHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF (CXRN) and Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities ETF (AOHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CXRN | AOHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.35 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.30 | 2.35 | -2.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.83 | 11.79 | -12.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CXRN vs. AOHY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CXRN drawdown since its inception was -53.17%, which is greater than AOHY's maximum drawdown of -4.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CXRN and AOHY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CXRN | AOHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.17% | -4.17% | -49.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.96% | -2.37% | -29.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -46.00% | -0.34% | -45.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.70% | -0.34% | -31.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.66% | 0.47% | +11.19% |
Volatility
CXRN vs. AOHY - Volatility Comparison
Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF (CXRN) has a higher volatility of 15.18% compared to Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities ETF (AOHY) at 0.60%. This indicates that CXRN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AOHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CXRN | AOHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.18% | 0.60% | +14.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.46% | 2.53% | +26.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.65% | 3.15% | +34.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.12% | 3.71% | +34.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.12% | 3.71% | +34.41% |
CXRN vs. AOHY - Expense Ratio Comparison
CXRN has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than AOHY's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
CXRN vs. AOHY - Dividend Comparison
CXRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.38%, less than AOHY's 6.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
AOHY Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities ETF | 6.61% | 6.53% | 6.04% |
CXRN Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF | 2.38% | 3.30% | 0.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CXRN and AOHY have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CXRN has higher volatility (15.18%) compared to AOHY (0.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CXRN dropped -53.17% vs AOHY's -4.17%.
On 1-year performance, AOHY leads with 5.54% vs -7.33% for CXRN. On fees, AOHY is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, AOHY has been the lower-risk option at 0.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AOHY has performed better with a 5.54% return vs -7.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AOHY is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for CXRN.
AOHY has the higher dividend yield at 6.61%, compared with 2.38% for CXRN.
CXRN is categorized as Leveraged Commodities, while AOHY is High Yield Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Teucrium and Angel Oak. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for CXRN and 0.55% for AOHY.
AOHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CXRN and AOHY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer