PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CXHYX vs. RTHAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CXHYX vs. RTHAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Delaware National High-Yield Municipal Bond Fund (CXHYX) and Russell Investments Tax-Exempt High Yield Bond Fund (RTHAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CXHYX achieves a 2.29% return, which is significantly lower than RTHAX's 2.98% return. Over the past 10 years, CXHYX has outperformed RTHAX with an annualized return of 3.26%, while RTHAX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.79% annualized return.


CXHYX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.51%
YTD
2.29%
6M
2.85%
1Y
5.56%
3Y*
4.41%
5Y*
0.78%
10Y*
3.26%

RTHAX

1D
0.00%
1M
2.12%
YTD
2.98%
6M
3.09%
1Y
6.64%
3Y*
4.28%
5Y*
0.60%
10Y*
2.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CXHYX vs. RTHAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CXHYX
Delaware National High-Yield Municipal Bond Fund
2.29%1.71%5.76%8.26%-14.85%7.86%6.49%11.52%1.58%10.15%
RTHAX
Russell Investments Tax-Exempt High Yield Bond Fund
2.98%2.11%4.49%7.78%-13.62%5.54%3.84%10.18%3.20%8.19%

Correlation

The correlation between CXHYX and RTHAX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.76

The correlation between CXHYX and RTHAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.84 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CXHYX vs. RTHAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CXHYX
CXHYX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
CXHYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CXHYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
CXHYX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
CXHYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
CXHYX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

RTHAX
RTHAX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
RTHAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RTHAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
RTHAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
RTHAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
RTHAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CXHYX vs. RTHAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Delaware National High-Yield Municipal Bond Fund (CXHYX) and Russell Investments Tax-Exempt High Yield Bond Fund (RTHAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CXHYXRTHAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.62

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.73

2.51

-0.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.96

8.25

-3.30

CXHYX vs. RTHAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CXHYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is lower than the RTHAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CXHYX and RTHAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CXHYX vs. RTHAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CXHYX drawdown since its inception was -21.82%, which is greater than RTHAX's maximum drawdown of -18.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CXHYX and RTHAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CXHYXRTHAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.82%

-18.89%

-2.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.31%

-2.74%

-0.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.55%

-7.56%

-1.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.11%

-18.89%

-1.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.11%

-18.89%

-1.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.41%

0.00%

-0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.58%

-3.71%

+1.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.15%

0.83%

+0.32%

Volatility

CXHYX vs. RTHAX - Volatility Comparison

Delaware National High-Yield Municipal Bond Fund (CXHYX) has a higher volatility of 1.09% compared to Russell Investments Tax-Exempt High Yield Bond Fund (RTHAX) at 0.75%. This indicates that CXHYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RTHAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CXHYXRTHAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.09%

0.75%

+0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.83%

2.07%

+0.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.04%

2.88%

+1.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.08%

5.12%

+0.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.81%

4.98%

+0.83%

CXHYX vs. RTHAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CXHYX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than RTHAX's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

CXHYX vs. RTHAX - Dividend Comparison

CXHYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.97%, more than RTHAX's 4.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CXHYX
Delaware National High-Yield Municipal Bond Fund
4.97%6.41%5.43%3.99%4.94%3.61%4.42%5.27%4.92%4.98%3.87%3.77%
RTHAX
Russell Investments Tax-Exempt High Yield Bond Fund
4.20%3.60%4.02%3.97%3.64%2.80%3.10%3.83%3.86%3.44%4.06%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CXHYX and RTHAX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CXHYX has higher volatility (1.09%) compared to RTHAX (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CXHYX dropped -21.82% vs RTHAX's -18.89%.

RTHAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CXHYX and RTHAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer