CXAP.L vs. UB01.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CXAP.L (UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) and UB01.L (UBS ETF (LU) EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis) are both exchange-traded funds - CXAP.L is a Commodities fund tracking the UBS CMCI Ex Agriculture Ex Livestock Capped, while UB01.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI EMU NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CXAP.L returned 12.09%/yr vs 11.92%/yr for UB01.L. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CXAP.L charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for UB01.L.

Performance

CXAP.L vs. UB01.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (CXAP.L) and UBS ETF (LU) EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UB01.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CXAP.L achieves a 26.29% return, which is significantly higher than UB01.L's 5.77% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CXAP.L having a 12.09% annualized return and UB01.L not far behind at 11.92%.

CXAP.L

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 3.94%
• YTD: 26.29%
• 6M: 27.63%
• 1Y: 45.18%
• 3Y*: 15.50%
• 5Y*: 14.72%
• 10Y*: 12.09%

UB01.L

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: 3.60%
• YTD: 5.77%
• 6M: 7.24%
• 1Y: 18.75%
• 3Y*: 16.24%
• 5Y*: 11.50%
• 10Y*: 11.92%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CXAP.L vs. UB01.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CXAP.L UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc	26.29%	10.65%	8.67%	-10.60%	27.69%	36.79%	-4.93%	7.15%	-6.02%	5.06%
UB01.L UBS ETF (LU) EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis	5.77%	28.34%	6.43%	19.85%	-4.38%	14.47%	4.04%	16.99%	-6.90%	18.45%

Correlation

The correlation between CXAP.L and UB01.L is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.21
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.04
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.00
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2016	0.02

The correlation between CXAP.L and UB01.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.21 (1 year) to 0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CXAP.L vs. UB01.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CXAP.L	UB01.L
Technology	32.6%	17.8%
Industrials	14.6%	21.7%
Financial Services	12.6%	25.0%
Communication Services	10.6%	2.4%
Consumer Cyclical	10.6%	9.6%
Healthcare	6.4%	5.1%
Utilities	4.4%	4.6%
Consumer Defensive	3.9%	5.4%
Energy	2.9%	5.0%
Basic Materials	1.4%	3.5%
Real Estate	0.2%	-

Return for Risk

CXAP.L vs. UB01.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CXAP.L

CXAP.L Risk / Return Rank: 88
CXAP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
CXAP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
CXAP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 85
CXAP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
CXAP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 90

UB01.L

UB01.L Risk / Return Rank: 41
UB01.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
UB01.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
UB01.L Omega Ratio Rank: 41
UB01.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
UB01.L Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CXAP.L vs. UB01.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (CXAP.L) and UBS ETF (LU) EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UB01.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CXAP.L	UB01.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.89	1.45	+1.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.71	2.13	+1.58
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.27	+0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.82	2.06	+5.76
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.31	6.44	+13.87
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CXAP.L vs. UB01.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CXAP.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.89, which is higher than the UB01.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CXAP.L and UB01.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CXAP.L	UB01.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.89	1.45	+1.44
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91	1.11	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.76	1.67	-0.91
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.76	1.60	-0.84

Drawdowns

CXAP.L vs. UB01.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CXAP.L drawdown since its inception was -31.30%, which is greater than UB01.L's maximum drawdown of -29.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CXAP.L and UB01.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	CXAP.L	UB01.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.30%	-29.27%	-2.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.75%	-11.38%	+5.63%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.43%	-13.55%	-1.88%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.53%	-21.12%	-0.41%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.30%	-29.27%	-2.03%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.77%	-1.19%	+0.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.24%	-4.21%	-4.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.22%	3.92%	-1.70%

Volatility

CXAP.L vs. UB01.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (CXAP.L) is 4.57%, while UBS ETF (LU) EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UB01.L) has a volatility of 4.83%. This indicates that CXAP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UB01.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CXAP.L	UB01.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.57%	4.83%	-0.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.73%	12.85%	-0.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.57%	16.16%	-0.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.18%	26.82%	-10.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.05%	31.16%	-15.11%

CXAP.L vs. UB01.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CXAP.L has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than UB01.L's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

CXAP.L vs. UB01.L - Dividend Comparison

CXAP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UB01.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CXAP.L UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
UB01.L UBS ETF (LU) EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis	2.58%	2.43%	3.13%	2.86%	2.78%	1.94%	1.93%	3.04%	2.77%	2.89%	3.55%	3.50%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CXAP.L and UB01.L in my portfolio?

CXAP.L and UB01.L have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CXAP.L or UB01.L?

On fees, UB01.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CXAP.L or UB01.L?

UB01.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for CXAP.L.

What is the main difference between CXAP.L and UB01.L?

CXAP.L is categorized as Commodities, while UB01.L is Europe Equities. CXAP.L tracks UBS CMCI Ex Agriculture Ex Livestock Capped, while UB01.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for CXAP.L and 0.15% for UB01.L.