CXAP.L vs. ROLL.L
CXAP.L (UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) and ROLL.L (iShares Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Swap UCITS ETF) are both Commodities funds - CXAP.L tracks the UBS CMCI Ex Agriculture Ex Livestock Capped while ROLL.L tracks the iShares Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Swap UCITS ETF. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CXAP.L returned 12.21%/yr vs 12.89%/yr for ROLL.L. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CXAP.L charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for ROLL.L.
Performance
CXAP.L vs. ROLL.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CXAP.L is traded in GBp, while ROLL.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ROLL.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CXAP.L achieves a 17.54% return, which is significantly lower than ROLL.L's 22.67% return.
CXAP.L
- 1D
- 1.48%
- 1M
- -2.10%
- 6M
- 11.29%
- YTD
- 17.54%
- 1Y
- 29.34%
- 3Y*
- 13.48%
- 5Y*
- 12.21%
- 10Y*
- 9.86%
ROLL.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- 6M
- 15.72%
- YTD
- 22.67%
- 1Y
- 32.79%
- 3Y*
- 13.10%
- 5Y*
- 12.89%
- 10Y*
- —
CXAP.L vs. ROLL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CXAP.L UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 17.54% | 10.65% | 8.67% | -10.60% | 27.69% | 36.79% | -4.93% | 7.15% | -13.37% |
ROLL.L iShares Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Swap UCITS ETF | 22.67% | 8.61% | 6.51% | -7.11% | 30.54% | 28.89% | -2.13% | 1.26% | -9.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between CXAP.L and ROLL.L is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2018 | 0.81 |
The correlation between CXAP.L and ROLL.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CXAP.L vs. ROLL.L — Risk / Return Rank
CXAP.L
ROLL.L
CXAP.L vs. ROLL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (CXAP.L) and iShares Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ROLL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CXAP.L | ROLL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.34 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.81 | 2.73 | +0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.67 | 8.93 | +0.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CXAP.L vs. ROLL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CXAP.L drawdown since its inception was -31.30%, which is greater than ROLL.L's maximum drawdown of -23.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CXAP.L and ROLL.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CXAP.L | ROLL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.30% | -23.20% | -8.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.47% | -12.10% | +1.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.43% | -13.37% | -2.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.53% | -20.56% | -0.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.64% | -8.08% | +0.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.20% | -9.49% | +1.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.05% | 3.70% | -0.65% |
Volatility
CXAP.L vs. ROLL.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (CXAP.L) is 3.93%, while iShares Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ROLL.L) has a volatility of 4.16%. This indicates that CXAP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROLL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CXAP.L | ROLL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.93% | 4.16% | -0.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.72% | 15.01% | -2.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.36% | 17.18% | -1.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.30% | 16.41% | -0.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.72% | 15.42% | +0.30% |
CXAP.L vs. ROLL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CXAP.L has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than ROLL.L's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
CXAP.L vs. ROLL.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CXAP.L nor ROLL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CXAP.L and ROLL.L have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ROLL.L is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ROLL.L is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for CXAP.L.
CXAP.L tracks UBS CMCI Ex Agriculture Ex Livestock Capped, while ROLL.L tracks iShares Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Swap UCITS ETF. They also come from different issuers: UBS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for CXAP.L and 0.28% for ROLL.L.
Find the right allocation for CXAP.L and ROLL.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer