CXAP.L vs. FAIG.L
CXAP.L (UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) and FAIG.L (WisdomTree Broad Commodities Longer Dated) are both Commodities funds - CXAP.L tracks the UBS CMCI Ex Agriculture Ex Livestock Capped while FAIG.L tracks the Bloomberg Commodity 3 Month Forward. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CXAP.L returned 12.09%/yr vs 8.54%/yr for FAIG.L. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CXAP.L charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for FAIG.L.
Performance
CXAP.L vs. FAIG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CXAP.L is traded in GBp, while FAIG.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FAIG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CXAP.L achieves a 26.29% return, which is significantly higher than FAIG.L's 21.26% return. Over the past 10 years, CXAP.L has outperformed FAIG.L with an annualized return of 12.09%, while FAIG.L has yielded a comparatively lower 8.54% annualized return.
CXAP.L
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 3.94%
- YTD
- 26.29%
- 6M
- 27.63%
- 1Y
- 45.18%
- 3Y*
- 15.50%
- 5Y*
- 14.72%
- 10Y*
- 12.09%
FAIG.L
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 1.08%
- YTD
- 21.26%
- 6M
- 20.55%
- 1Y
- 33.42%
- 3Y*
- 11.36%
- 5Y*
- 12.25%
- 10Y*
- 8.54%
CXAP.L vs. FAIG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CXAP.L UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 26.29% | 10.65% | 8.67% | -10.60% | 27.69% | 36.79% | -4.93% | 7.15% | -6.02% | 5.06% |
FAIG.L WisdomTree Broad Commodities Longer Dated | 21.26% | 7.66% | 5.90% | -11.88% | 29.81% | 31.66% | -0.96% | 2.48% | -4.06% | -5.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between CXAP.L and FAIG.L is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2016 | 0.79 |
The correlation between CXAP.L and FAIG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (10 years) to 0.89 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CXAP.L vs. FAIG.L — Risk / Return Rank
CXAP.L
FAIG.L
CXAP.L vs. FAIG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (CXAP.L) and WisdomTree Broad Commodities Longer Dated (FAIG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CXAP.L | FAIG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.40 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.82 | 4.99 | +2.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.31 | 13.19 | +7.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CXAP.L | FAIG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.89 | 2.23 | +0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 | 0.78 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 | 0.58 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 0.24 | +0.52 |
Drawdowns
CXAP.L vs. FAIG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CXAP.L drawdown since its inception was -31.30%, smaller than the maximum FAIG.L drawdown of -51.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CXAP.L and FAIG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CXAP.L | FAIG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.30% | -51.32% | +20.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.75% | -6.66% | +0.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.43% | -12.87% | -2.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.53% | -26.47% | +4.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.30% | -26.47% | -4.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.77% | -2.59% | +1.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.24% | -26.25% | +18.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.22% | 2.53% | -0.31% |
Volatility
CXAP.L vs. FAIG.L - Volatility Comparison
UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (CXAP.L) and WisdomTree Broad Commodities Longer Dated (FAIG.L) have volatilities of 4.57% and 4.74%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CXAP.L | FAIG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.57% | 4.74% | -0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.73% | 12.12% | +0.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.57% | 14.93% | +0.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.18% | 15.73% | +0.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.05% | 14.71% | +1.34% |
CXAP.L vs. FAIG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CXAP.L has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than FAIG.L's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
CXAP.L vs. FAIG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CXAP.L nor FAIG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CXAP.L and FAIG.L have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CXAP.L is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CXAP.L is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for FAIG.L.
CXAP.L tracks UBS CMCI Ex Agriculture Ex Livestock Capped, while FAIG.L tracks Bloomberg Commodity 3 Month Forward. They also come from different issuers: UBS and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for CXAP.L and 0.49% for FAIG.L.
Find the right allocation for CXAP.L and FAIG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer