CXAP.L vs. CMOP.L
CXAP.L (UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) and CMOP.L (Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF Acc) are both Commodities funds - CXAP.L tracks the UBS CMCI Ex Agriculture Ex Livestock Capped while CMOP.L tracks the Bloomberg Commodity. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CXAP.L returned 14.72%/yr vs 12.38%/yr for CMOP.L. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CXAP.L charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for CMOP.L.
Performance
CXAP.L vs. CMOP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CXAP.L having a 26.29% return and CMOP.L slightly higher at 26.50%.
CXAP.L
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 3.94%
- YTD
- 26.29%
- 6M
- 27.63%
- 1Y
- 45.18%
- 3Y*
- 15.50%
- 5Y*
- 14.72%
- 10Y*
- 12.09%
CMOP.L
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -0.24%
- YTD
- 26.50%
- 6M
- 24.83%
- 1Y
- 40.15%
- 3Y*
- 13.35%
- 5Y*
- 12.38%
- 10Y*
- —
CXAP.L vs. CMOP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CXAP.L UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 26.29% | 10.65% | 8.67% | -10.60% | 27.69% | 36.79% | -4.93% | 7.15% | -6.02% | 4.05% |
CMOP.L Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF Acc | 26.50% | 8.23% | 6.01% | -12.72% | 28.44% | 28.71% | -7.11% | 3.31% | -5.01% | -5.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between CXAP.L and CMOP.L is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2017 | 0.85 |
The correlation between CXAP.L and CMOP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
CXAP.L vs. CMOP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CXAP.L
CMOP.L
Technology
Industrials
-
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
CXAP.L
CMOP.L
Industrials
CXAP.L
CMOP.L
-
Financial Services
CXAP.L
CMOP.L
Communication Services
CXAP.L
CMOP.L
Consumer Cyclical
CXAP.L
CMOP.L
Healthcare
CXAP.L
CMOP.L
-
Utilities
CXAP.L
CMOP.L
-
Consumer Defensive
CXAP.L
CMOP.L
Energy
CXAP.L
CMOP.L
-
Basic Materials
CXAP.L
CMOP.L
Real Estate
CXAP.L
CMOP.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CXAP.L vs. CMOP.L — Risk / Return Rank
CXAP.L
CMOP.L
CXAP.L vs. CMOP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (CXAP.L) and Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF Acc (CMOP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CXAP.L | CMOP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.40 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.82 | 5.24 | +2.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.31 | 12.05 | +8.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CXAP.L | CMOP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.89 | 2.18 | +0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 | 0.75 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 0.44 | +0.32 |
Drawdowns
CXAP.L vs. CMOP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CXAP.L drawdown since its inception was -31.30%, which is greater than CMOP.L's maximum drawdown of -28.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CXAP.L and CMOP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CXAP.L | CMOP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.30% | -28.78% | -2.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.75% | -7.63% | +1.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.43% | -14.89% | -0.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.53% | -28.78% | +7.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.77% | -3.71% | +2.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.24% | -12.18% | +3.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.22% | 3.32% | -1.10% |
Volatility
CXAP.L vs. CMOP.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (CXAP.L) is 4.57%, while Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF Acc (CMOP.L) has a volatility of 6.20%. This indicates that CXAP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMOP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CXAP.L | CMOP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.57% | 6.20% | -1.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.73% | 16.11% | -3.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.57% | 18.36% | -2.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.18% | 16.58% | -0.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.05% | 15.14% | +0.91% |
CXAP.L vs. CMOP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CXAP.L has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than CMOP.L's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
CXAP.L vs. CMOP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CXAP.L nor CMOP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, CXAP.L and CMOP.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, CMOP.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CMOP.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for CXAP.L.
CXAP.L tracks UBS CMCI Ex Agriculture Ex Livestock Capped, while CMOP.L tracks Bloomberg Commodity. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for CXAP.L and 0.19% for CMOP.L.
Find the right allocation for CXAP.L and CMOP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer