PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CXAP.L vs. 5ESG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CXAP.L vs. 5ESG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (CXAP.L) and UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist (5ESG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CXAP.L achieves a 26.29% return, which is significantly higher than 5ESG.L's 8.72% return.


CXAP.L

1D
0.14%
1M
3.94%
YTD
26.29%
6M
27.63%
1Y
45.18%
3Y*
15.50%
5Y*
14.72%
10Y*
12.09%

5ESG.L

1D
-0.76%
1M
4.09%
YTD
8.72%
6M
10.01%
1Y
29.94%
3Y*
20.89%
5Y*
13.18%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CXAP.L vs. 5ESG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
CXAP.L
UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc
26.29%10.65%8.67%-10.60%27.69%36.79%-4.93%0.04%
5ESG.L
UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist
8.72%18.26%23.62%26.17%-20.24%31.59%15.77%14.68%

Correlation

The correlation between CXAP.L and 5ESG.L is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2019

0.08

The correlation between CXAP.L and 5ESG.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.08 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CXAP.L vs. 5ESG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CXAP.L
5ESG.L

Technology

32.6%
38.6%

Industrials

14.6%
6.8%

Financial Services

12.6%
12.0%

Communication Services

10.6%
14.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.6%
4.6%

Healthcare

6.4%
9.3%

Utilities

4.4%
0.8%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
5.1%

Energy

2.9%
4.2%

Basic Materials

1.4%
1.9%

Real Estate

0.2%
2.2%

Technology

CXAP.L
32.6%
5ESG.L
38.6%

Industrials

CXAP.L
14.6%
5ESG.L
6.8%

Financial Services

CXAP.L
12.6%
5ESG.L
12.0%

Communication Services

CXAP.L
10.6%
5ESG.L
14.5%

Consumer Cyclical

CXAP.L
10.6%
5ESG.L
4.6%

Healthcare

CXAP.L
6.4%
5ESG.L
9.3%

Utilities

CXAP.L
4.4%
5ESG.L
0.8%

Consumer Defensive

CXAP.L
3.9%
5ESG.L
5.1%

Energy

CXAP.L
2.9%
5ESG.L
4.2%

Basic Materials

CXAP.L
1.4%
5ESG.L
1.9%

Real Estate

CXAP.L
0.2%
5ESG.L
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CXAP.L vs. 5ESG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CXAP.L
CXAP.L Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
CXAP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CXAP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
CXAP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
CXAP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
CXAP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

5ESG.L
5ESG.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
5ESG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
5ESG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
5ESG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
5ESG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
5ESG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CXAP.L vs. 5ESG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (CXAP.L) and UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist (5ESG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CXAP.L5ESG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.48

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.82

3.31

+4.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.31

14.54

+5.77

CXAP.L vs. 5ESG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CXAP.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.89, which is comparable to the 5ESG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CXAP.L and 5ESG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CXAP.L5ESG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.89

2.60

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

0.87

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

1.04

-0.28

Drawdowns

CXAP.L vs. 5ESG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CXAP.L drawdown since its inception was -31.30%, roughly equal to the maximum 5ESG.L drawdown of -31.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CXAP.L and 5ESG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CXAP.L5ESG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.30%

-31.50%

+0.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.75%

-9.01%

+3.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.43%

-19.53%

+4.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.53%

-25.41%

+3.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.77%

-0.76%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.24%

-5.70%

-2.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.22%

2.05%

+0.17%

Volatility

CXAP.L vs. 5ESG.L - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (CXAP.L) has a higher volatility of 4.57% compared to UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist (5ESG.L) at 3.43%. This indicates that CXAP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 5ESG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CXAP.L5ESG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.57%

3.43%

+1.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.73%

8.49%

+4.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.57%

11.48%

+4.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.18%

16.54%

-0.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.05%

19.13%

-3.08%

CXAP.L vs. 5ESG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CXAP.L has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than 5ESG.L's 0.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

CXAP.L vs. 5ESG.L - Dividend Comparison

CXAP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while 5ESG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
5ESG.L
UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist
0.63%0.87%0.47%1.07%1.32%0.89%1.25%0.39%
CXAP.L
UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CXAP.L and 5ESG.L have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 5ESG.L is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

5ESG.L is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for CXAP.L.

CXAP.L is categorized as Commodities, while 5ESG.L is S&P 500. CXAP.L tracks UBS CMCI Ex Agriculture Ex Livestock Capped, while 5ESG.L tracks S&P 500 ESG Index. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for CXAP.L and 0.17% for 5ESG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CXAP.L and 5ESG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer