CWY vs. FTQI
CWY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST CRWV ETF) and FTQI (First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CWY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while FTQI is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. CWY is actively managed, while FTQI is passively managed. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CWY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FTQI.
Performance
CWY vs. FTQI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CWY
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- -11.35%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
FTQI
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- 6M
- 11.24%
- YTD
- 12.14%
- 1Y
- 25.21%
- 3Y*
- 16.53%
- 5Y*
- 11.93%
- 10Y*
- 8.12%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.03%
CWY vs. FTQI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CWY GraniteShares YieldBOOST CRWV ETF | -9.00% |
FTQI First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF | 2.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between CWY and FTQI is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2026 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CWY vs. FTQI — Risk / Return Rank
CWY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FTQI
CWY vs. FTQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST CRWV ETF (CWY) and First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF (FTQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CWY | FTQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.43 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.06 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 19.14 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CWY vs. FTQI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CWY drawdown since its inception was -11.67%, smaller than the maximum FTQI drawdown of -19.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWY and FTQI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CWY | FTQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.67% | -19.42% | +7.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -19.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.67% | -1.39% | -10.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.96% | -3.72% | -0.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.32% | — |
Volatility
CWY vs. FTQI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CWY | FTQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.90% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.83% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.20% | 10.90% | +5.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.20% | 14.80% | +1.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.20% | 12.94% | +3.26% |
CWY vs. FTQI - Expense Ratio Comparison
CWY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than FTQI's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
CWY vs. FTQI - Dividend Comparison
CWY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.04%, more than FTQI's 10.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWY GraniteShares YieldBOOST CRWV ETF | 14.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FTQI First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF | 10.98% | 11.46% | 11.66% | 11.49% | 9.85% | 3.05% | 3.27% | 2.95% | 3.27% | 2.74% | 3.02% | 3.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CWY and FTQI have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FTQI is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FTQI is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for CWY.
CWY has the higher dividend yield at 14.04%, compared with 10.98% for FTQI.
CWY is categorized as Derivative Income, while FTQI is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for CWY and 0.75% for FTQI.
Find the right allocation for CWY and FTQI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer