CWY vs. IVVW
CWY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST CRWV ETF) and IVVW (iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. CWY is actively managed, while IVVW is passively managed. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CWY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IVVW.
Performance
CWY vs. IVVW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CWY
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IVVW
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- YTD
- 5.13%
- 6M
- 5.14%
- 1Y
- 17.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CWY vs. IVVW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CWY GraniteShares YieldBOOST CRWV ETF | -0.32% |
IVVW iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF | 1.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between CWY and IVVW is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2026 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CWY vs. IVVW — Risk / Return Rank
CWY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IVVW
CWY vs. IVVW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST CRWV ETF (CWY) and iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (IVVW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CWY | IVVW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.47 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.98 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 15.80 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CWY vs. IVVW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CWY drawdown since its inception was -4.40%, smaller than the maximum IVVW drawdown of -16.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWY and IVVW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CWY | IVVW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.40% | -16.79% | +12.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.24% | -0.31% | -2.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.69% | -1.73% | +0.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.09% | — |
Volatility
CWY vs. IVVW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CWY | IVVW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.57% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 6.96% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.45% | 8.10% | +5.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.45% | 12.67% | +0.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.45% | 12.67% | +0.78% |
CWY vs. IVVW - Expense Ratio Comparison
CWY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than IVVW's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
CWY vs. IVVW - Dividend Comparison
CWY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.95%, less than IVVW's 19.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CWY GraniteShares YieldBOOST CRWV ETF | 7.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IVVW iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF | 19.65% | 18.55% | 13.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CWY and IVVW have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IVVW is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IVVW is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for CWY.
IVVW has the higher dividend yield at 19.65%, compared with 7.95% for CWY.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for CWY and 0.25% for IVVW.
Find the right allocation for CWY and IVVW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer