CWST vs. FICO
CWST (Casella Waste Systems, Inc.) and FICO (Fair Isaac Corporation) are both stocks. CWST operates in Waste Management (Industrials), while FICO operates in Software - Application (Technology). Over the past 10 years, CWST returned 28.10%/yr vs 26.62%/yr for FICO. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CWST vs. FICO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CWST achieves a -8.75% return, which is significantly higher than FICO's -30.25% return. Over the past 10 years, CWST has outperformed FICO with an annualized return of 28.10%, while FICO has yielded a comparatively lower 26.62% annualized return.
CWST
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 4.92%
- YTD
- -8.75%
- 6M
- -9.77%
- 1Y
- -24.11%
- 3Y*
- 0.57%
- 5Y*
- 6.31%
- 10Y*
- 28.10%
FICO
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- 7.34%
- YTD
- -30.25%
- 6M
- -36.09%
- 1Y
- -33.92%
- 3Y*
- 13.73%
- 5Y*
- 18.49%
- 10Y*
- 26.62%
CWST vs. FICO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWST Casella Waste Systems, Inc. | -8.75% | -7.44% | 23.81% | 7.75% | -7.15% | 37.89% | 34.59% | 61.57% | 23.76% | 85.50% |
FICO Fair Isaac Corporation | -30.25% | -15.08% | 71.04% | 94.46% | 38.03% | -15.14% | 36.39% | 100.36% | 22.06% | 28.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between CWST and FICO is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 1997 | 0.27 |
The correlation between CWST and FICO shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (1 year) to 0.29 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CWST:
$5.68B
FICO:
$28.00B
CWST:
$0.11
FICO:
$31.51
CWST:
794.75
FICO:
37.43
CWST:
3.02
FICO:
12.60
CWST:
$1.88B
FICO:
$2.26B
CWST:
$248.24M
FICO:
$1.90B
CWST:
$405.88M
FICO:
$1.16B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CWST vs. FICO — Risk / Return Rank
CWST
FICO
CWST vs. FICO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Casella Waste Systems, Inc. (CWST) and Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CWST | FICO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 0.90 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.68 | -0.65 | -0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.16 | -1.24 | +0.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CWST vs. FICO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CWST drawdown since its inception was -98.52%, which is greater than FICO's maximum drawdown of -79.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWST and FICO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CWST | FICO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.52% | -79.26% | -19.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.37% | -52.12% | +15.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.72% | -61.28% | +23.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.72% | -61.28% | +23.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.72% | -61.28% | +23.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.75% | -50.50% | +24.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -53.02% | -18.03% | -34.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.53% | 27.47% | -5.94% |
Volatility
CWST vs. FICO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Casella Waste Systems, Inc. (CWST) is 9.81%, while Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) has a volatility of 14.33%. This indicates that CWST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FICO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CWST | FICO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.81% | 14.33% | -4.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.30% | 39.21% | -11.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.64% | 50.67% | -17.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.27% | 40.73% | -13.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.91% | 38.07% | -7.16% |
Dividends
CWST vs. FICO - Dividend Comparison
Neither CWST nor FICO has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWST Casella Waste Systems, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FICO Fair Isaac Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.07% | 0.08% |
Financials
CWST vs. FICO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Casella Waste Systems, Inc. and Fair Isaac Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CWST vs. FICO - Profitability Comparison
CWST - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Casella Waste Systems, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 457.33M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
FICO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fair Isaac Corporation reported a gross profit of 600.48M and revenue of 691.68M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.8%.
CWST - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Casella Waste Systems, Inc. reported an operating income of 4.86M and revenue of 457.33M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.1%.
FICO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fair Isaac Corporation reported an operating income of 402.47M and revenue of 691.68M, resulting in an operating margin of 58.2%.
CWST - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Casella Waste Systems, Inc. reported a net income of -5.54M and revenue of 457.33M, resulting in a net margin of -1.2%.
FICO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fair Isaac Corporation reported a net income of 264.46M and revenue of 691.68M, resulting in a net margin of 38.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CWST and FICO have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FICO has higher volatility (14.33%) compared to CWST (9.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CWST dropped -98.52% vs FICO's -79.26%.
FICO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.67 vs -0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CWST and FICO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer