PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CWSGX vs. NEAIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CWSGX vs. NEAIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Chartwell Small Cap Growth Fund (CWSGX) and Needham Aggressive Growth Fund Institutional Class (NEAIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CWSGX achieves a 28.62% return, which is significantly lower than NEAIX's 59.81% return.


CWSGX

1D
2.32%
1M
8.37%
YTD
28.62%
6M
27.92%
1Y
56.90%
3Y*
30.49%
5Y*
12.31%
10Y*

NEAIX

1D
3.25%
1M
17.12%
YTD
59.81%
6M
61.32%
1Y
97.17%
3Y*
39.29%
5Y*
24.27%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CWSGX vs. NEAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CWSGX
Chartwell Small Cap Growth Fund
28.62%14.77%35.94%22.41%-30.85%15.83%42.56%27.38%-8.37%11.08%
NEAIX
Needham Aggressive Growth Fund Institutional Class
59.81%26.99%14.86%38.37%-27.02%38.46%52.49%44.68%-15.64%6.65%

Correlation

The correlation between CWSGX and NEAIX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2017

0.84

The correlation between CWSGX and NEAIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CWSGX vs. NEAIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CWSGX
CWSGX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
CWSGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CWSGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
CWSGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
CWSGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
CWSGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

NEAIX
NEAIX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
NEAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
NEAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CWSGX vs. NEAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chartwell Small Cap Growth Fund (CWSGX) and Needham Aggressive Growth Fund Institutional Class (NEAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CWSGXNEAIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.59

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.00

7.27

-2.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.17

29.35

-9.18

CWSGX vs. NEAIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CWSGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is lower than the NEAIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CWSGX and NEAIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CWSGXNEAIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.60

3.94

-1.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.99

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.91

-0.27

Drawdowns

CWSGX vs. NEAIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CWSGX drawdown since its inception was -37.29%, roughly equal to the maximum NEAIX drawdown of -35.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWSGX and NEAIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CWSGXNEAIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.29%

-35.93%

-1.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.97%

-13.98%

+2.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.80%

-28.21%

+0.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.29%

-35.93%

-1.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.21%

-8.60%

-2.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.96%

3.46%

-0.50%

Volatility

CWSGX vs. NEAIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Chartwell Small Cap Growth Fund (CWSGX) is 8.40%, while Needham Aggressive Growth Fund Institutional Class (NEAIX) has a volatility of 10.14%. This indicates that CWSGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CWSGXNEAIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.40%

10.14%

-1.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.07%

20.44%

-2.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.02%

25.80%

-2.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.17%

24.58%

-0.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.16%

24.60%

-0.44%

CWSGX vs. NEAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CWSGX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than NEAIX's 1.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

CWSGX vs. NEAIX - Dividend Comparison

CWSGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, less than NEAIX's 1.26% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CWSGX
Chartwell Small Cap Growth Fund
0.68%0.87%6.44%0.00%4.78%21.74%6.70%0.03%0.45%0.02%
NEAIX
Needham Aggressive Growth Fund Institutional Class
1.26%2.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%6.84%3.80%10.42%16.35%5.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


CWSGX and NEAIX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NEAIX has higher volatility (10.14%) compared to CWSGX (8.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CWSGX dropped -37.29% vs NEAIX's -35.93%.

NEAIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.94 vs 2.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CWSGX and NEAIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer