CWSGX vs. NEAIX
CWSGX (Chartwell Small Cap Growth Fund) and NEAIX (Needham Aggressive Growth Fund Institutional Class) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, CWSGX returned 12.31%/yr vs 24.27%/yr for NEAIX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CWSGX charges 1.05%/yr vs 1.20%/yr for NEAIX.
Performance
CWSGX vs. NEAIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CWSGX achieves a 28.62% return, which is significantly lower than NEAIX's 59.81% return.
CWSGX
- 1D
- 2.32%
- 1M
- 8.37%
- YTD
- 28.62%
- 6M
- 27.92%
- 1Y
- 56.90%
- 3Y*
- 30.49%
- 5Y*
- 12.31%
- 10Y*
- —
NEAIX
- 1D
- 3.25%
- 1M
- 17.12%
- YTD
- 59.81%
- 6M
- 61.32%
- 1Y
- 97.17%
- 3Y*
- 39.29%
- 5Y*
- 24.27%
- 10Y*
- —
CWSGX vs. NEAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWSGX Chartwell Small Cap Growth Fund | 28.62% | 14.77% | 35.94% | 22.41% | -30.85% | 15.83% | 42.56% | 27.38% | -8.37% | 11.08% |
NEAIX Needham Aggressive Growth Fund Institutional Class | 59.81% | 26.99% | 14.86% | 38.37% | -27.02% | 38.46% | 52.49% | 44.68% | -15.64% | 6.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between CWSGX and NEAIX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2017 | 0.84 |
The correlation between CWSGX and NEAIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CWSGX vs. NEAIX — Risk / Return Rank
CWSGX
NEAIX
CWSGX vs. NEAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chartwell Small Cap Growth Fund (CWSGX) and Needham Aggressive Growth Fund Institutional Class (NEAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CWSGX | NEAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.59 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.00 | 7.27 | -2.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.17 | 29.35 | -9.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CWSGX | NEAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.60 | 3.94 | -1.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.99 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.91 | -0.27 |
Drawdowns
CWSGX vs. NEAIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CWSGX drawdown since its inception was -37.29%, roughly equal to the maximum NEAIX drawdown of -35.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWSGX and NEAIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CWSGX | NEAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.29% | -35.93% | -1.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.97% | -13.98% | +2.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.80% | -28.21% | +0.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.29% | -35.93% | -1.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.21% | -8.60% | -2.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.96% | 3.46% | -0.50% |
Volatility
CWSGX vs. NEAIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Chartwell Small Cap Growth Fund (CWSGX) is 8.40%, while Needham Aggressive Growth Fund Institutional Class (NEAIX) has a volatility of 10.14%. This indicates that CWSGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CWSGX | NEAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.40% | 10.14% | -1.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.07% | 20.44% | -2.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.02% | 25.80% | -2.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.17% | 24.58% | -0.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.16% | 24.60% | -0.44% |
CWSGX vs. NEAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CWSGX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than NEAIX's 1.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
CWSGX vs. NEAIX - Dividend Comparison
CWSGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, less than NEAIX's 1.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWSGX Chartwell Small Cap Growth Fund | 0.68% | 0.87% | 6.44% | 0.00% | 4.78% | 21.74% | 6.70% | 0.03% | 0.45% | 0.02% |
NEAIX Needham Aggressive Growth Fund Institutional Class | 1.26% | 2.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 6.84% | 3.80% | 10.42% | 16.35% | 5.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CWSGX and NEAIX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NEAIX has higher volatility (10.14%) compared to CWSGX (8.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CWSGX dropped -37.29% vs NEAIX's -35.93%.
NEAIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.94 vs 2.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CWSGX and NEAIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer