CWSGX vs. NCLEX
CWSGX (Chartwell Small Cap Growth Fund) and NCLEX (Nicholas Limited Edition Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, CWSGX returned 12.31%/yr vs -0.95%/yr for NCLEX. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CWSGX charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for NCLEX.
Performance
CWSGX vs. NCLEX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CWSGX achieves a 28.62% return, which is significantly higher than NCLEX's -6.20% return.
CWSGX
- 1D
- 2.32%
- 1M
- 8.37%
- YTD
- 28.62%
- 6M
- 27.92%
- 1Y
- 56.90%
- 3Y*
- 30.49%
- 5Y*
- 12.31%
- 10Y*
- —
NCLEX
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 1.63%
- YTD
- -6.20%
- 6M
- -7.32%
- 1Y
- -11.96%
- 3Y*
- 0.87%
- 5Y*
- -0.95%
- 10Y*
- 7.27%
CWSGX vs. NCLEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWSGX Chartwell Small Cap Growth Fund | 28.62% | 14.77% | 35.94% | 22.41% | -30.85% | 15.83% | 42.56% | 27.38% | -8.37% | 11.08% |
NCLEX Nicholas Limited Edition Fund | -6.20% | -10.41% | 11.91% | 17.17% | -23.71% | 19.07% | 22.67% | 27.36% | -0.94% | 7.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between CWSGX and NCLEX is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2017 | 0.87 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CWSGX and NCLEX has dropped to 0.61 - well below their long-term average of 0.87, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CWSGX vs. NCLEX — Risk / Return Rank
CWSGX
NCLEX
CWSGX vs. NCLEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chartwell Small Cap Growth Fund (CWSGX) and Nicholas Limited Edition Fund (NCLEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CWSGX | NCLEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 0.91 | +0.52 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.00 | -0.51 | +5.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.17 | -1.06 | +21.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CWSGX | NCLEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.60 | -0.64 | +3.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | -0.05 | +0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.51 | +0.13 |
Drawdowns
CWSGX vs. NCLEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CWSGX drawdown since its inception was -37.29%, smaller than the maximum NCLEX drawdown of -48.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWSGX and NCLEX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CWSGX | NCLEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.29% | -48.68% | +11.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.97% | -21.36% | +9.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.80% | -28.50% | +0.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.29% | -28.50% | -8.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -21.53% | +21.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.21% | -8.28% | -2.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.96% | 10.19% | -7.23% |
Volatility
CWSGX vs. NCLEX - Volatility Comparison
Chartwell Small Cap Growth Fund (CWSGX) has a higher volatility of 8.40% compared to Nicholas Limited Edition Fund (NCLEX) at 5.11%. This indicates that CWSGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NCLEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CWSGX | NCLEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.40% | 5.11% | +3.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.07% | 12.12% | +5.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.02% | 16.90% | +6.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.17% | 19.52% | +4.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.16% | 19.21% | +4.95% |
CWSGX vs. NCLEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CWSGX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than NCLEX's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
CWSGX vs. NCLEX - Dividend Comparison
CWSGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, less than NCLEX's 8.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWSGX Chartwell Small Cap Growth Fund | 0.68% | 0.87% | 6.44% | 0.00% | 4.78% | 21.74% | 6.70% | 0.03% | 0.45% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NCLEX Nicholas Limited Edition Fund | 8.03% | 7.53% | 2.51% | 2.43% | 6.22% | 16.44% | 5.10% | 5.66% | 10.72% | 7.97% | 10.68% | 8.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CWSGX and NCLEX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CWSGX has higher volatility (8.40%) compared to NCLEX (5.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CWSGX dropped -37.29% vs NCLEX's -48.68%.
CWSGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs -0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CWSGX and NCLEX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer