PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CWSGX vs. CTSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CWSGX vs. CTSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Chartwell Small Cap Growth Fund (CWSGX) and Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund (CTSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CWSGX vs. CTSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
CWSGX
Chartwell Small Cap Growth Fund
-1.30%14.77%35.94%22.41%-30.85%15.83%42.56%7.06%
CTSIX
Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund
-4.77%25.90%44.34%7.57%-37.30%9.12%63.38%1.20%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CWSGX achieves a -1.30% return, which is significantly higher than CTSIX's -4.77% return.


CWSGX

1D
-2.62%
1M
-10.14%
YTD
-1.30%
6M
4.55%
1Y
28.23%
3Y*
21.14%
5Y*
6.43%
10Y*

CTSIX

1D
-3.92%
1M
-9.84%
YTD
-4.77%
6M
-1.18%
1Y
36.02%
3Y*
20.88%
5Y*
2.96%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CWSGX vs. CTSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CWSGX and CTSIX have an expense ratio of 1.05%.


Return for Risk

CWSGX vs. CTSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CWSGX
CWSGX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
CWSGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CWSGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
CWSGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
CWSGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
CWSGX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

CTSIX
CTSIX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
CTSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CTSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
CTSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
CTSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
CTSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CWSGX vs. CTSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chartwell Small Cap Growth Fund (CWSGX) and Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund (CTSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CWSGXCTSIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.08

1.29

-0.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.59

1.84

-0.24

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.24

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.99

2.78

-0.78

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.56

10.72

-3.16

CWSGX vs. CTSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CWSGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is comparable to the CTSIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CWSGX and CTSIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CWSGXCTSIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.08

1.29

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

0.11

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.39

+0.13

Correlation

The correlation between CWSGX and CTSIX is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

CWSGX vs. CTSIX - Dividend Comparison

CWSGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, while CTSIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CWSGX
Chartwell Small Cap Growth Fund
0.88%0.87%6.44%0.00%4.78%21.74%6.70%0.03%0.45%0.02%
CTSIX
Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%2.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.77%4.95%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CWSGX vs. CTSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CWSGX drawdown since its inception was -37.29%, smaller than the maximum CTSIX drawdown of -50.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWSGX and CTSIX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CWSGXCTSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.29%

-50.83%

+13.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.60%

-12.38%

-0.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.29%

-50.60%

+13.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.97%

-12.38%

+0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.40%

-21.13%

+9.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.32%

3.20%

+0.12%

Volatility

CWSGX vs. CTSIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Chartwell Small Cap Growth Fund (CWSGX) is 9.43%, while Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund (CTSIX) has a volatility of 12.38%. This indicates that CWSGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CWSGXCTSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.43%

12.38%

-2.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.23%

21.14%

-3.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.64%

29.23%

-3.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.85%

27.79%

-3.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.05%

29.69%

-5.64%