CWO.NEO vs. EMOP

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Emerging Markets Fundamental Index ETF (CWO.NEO) and AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMOP).

CWO.NEO and EMOP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CWO.NEO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets Index. It was launched on Apr 7, 2009. EMOP is an actively managed fund by AllianceBernstein. It was launched on Jun 17, 2025.

Performance

CWO.NEO vs. EMOP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Emerging Markets Fundamental Index ETF (CWO.NEO) and AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMOP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CWO.NEO vs. EMOP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CWO.NEO iShares Emerging Markets Fundamental Index ETF	4.72%	16.50%
EMOP AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF	11.32%	16.93%

Different Trading Currencies

CWO.NEO is traded in CAD, while EMOP is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EMOP values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CWO.NEO achieves a 4.72% return, which is significantly lower than EMOP's 11.32% return.

CWO.NEO

• 1D: -0.68%
• 1M: -3.79%
• YTD: 4.72%
• 6M: 6.75%
• 1Y: 24.14%
• 3Y*: 19.80%
• 5Y*: 10.38%
• 10Y*: 10.26%

EMOP

• 1D: 1.99%
• 1M: -4.03%
• YTD: 11.32%
• 6M: 14.09%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CWO.NEO vs. EMOP - Expense Ratio Comparison

CWO.NEO has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than EMOP's 0.70% expense ratio.

CWO.NEO

iShares Emerging Markets Fundamental Index ETF

EMOP

AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF

Return for Risk

CWO.NEO vs. EMOP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CWO.NEO

CWO.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 66
CWO.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
CWO.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
CWO.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 71
CWO.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
CWO.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CWO.NEO vs. EMOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Emerging Markets Fundamental Index ETF (CWO.NEO) and AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CWO.NEO	EMOP	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.32	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.84	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.72	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.53	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CWO.NEO	EMOP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.32	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.59	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.43	2.29	-1.86

Correlation

The correlation between CWO.NEO and EMOP is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

CWO.NEO vs. EMOP - Dividend Comparison

CWO.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.66%, more than EMOP's 0.61% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CWO.NEO iShares Emerging Markets Fundamental Index ETF	2.66%	2.79%	3.50%	4.14%	5.03%	4.61%	2.64%	3.01%	3.22%	2.60%	2.57%	3.23%
EMOP AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF	0.61%	0.27%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

CWO.NEO vs. EMOP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CWO.NEO drawdown since its inception was -31.99%, which is greater than EMOP's maximum drawdown of -11.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWO.NEO and EMOP.

Drawdown Indicators

	CWO.NEO	EMOP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.99%	-12.88%	-19.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.53%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.80%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.97%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.63%	-7.79%	+1.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.37%	-1.92%	-8.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.58%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CWO.NEO	EMOP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.45%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.47%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.33%	17.56%	+0.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.57%	17.56%	-0.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.54%	17.56%	-0.02%