CWIN.TO vs. ZDIV.TO
CWIN.TO (HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Enhanced Canadian Dividend ETF Class E Units) and ZDIV.TO (BMO MSCI Canada IMI High Dividend Yield Index ETF) are both Dividend funds - CWIN.TO tracks the Solactive Canada Dividend Elite Champions Index while ZDIV.TO tracks the MSCI Canada IMI High Dividend Yield Select Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CWIN.TO charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for ZDIV.TO.
Performance
CWIN.TO vs. ZDIV.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CWIN.TO
- 1D
- 0.99%
- 1M
- 4.14%
- YTD
- 15.75%
- 6M
- 18.53%
- 1Y
- 32.57%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZDIV.TO
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 2.47%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CWIN.TO vs. ZDIV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CWIN.TO HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Enhanced Canadian Dividend ETF Class E Units | 8.39% |
ZDIV.TO BMO MSCI Canada IMI High Dividend Yield Index ETF | 15.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between CWIN.TO and ZDIV.TO is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2026 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CWIN.TO vs. ZDIV.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CWIN.TO
ZDIV.TO
CWIN.TO vs. ZDIV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Enhanced Canadian Dividend ETF Class E Units (CWIN.TO) and BMO MSCI Canada IMI High Dividend Yield Index ETF (ZDIV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CWIN.TO | ZDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.57 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.73 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CWIN.TO | ZDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.69 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.30 | 5.66 | -3.37 |
Drawdowns
CWIN.TO vs. ZDIV.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CWIN.TO drawdown since its inception was -10.87%, which is greater than ZDIV.TO's maximum drawdown of -2.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWIN.TO and ZDIV.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CWIN.TO | ZDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.87% | -2.60% | -8.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.15% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.38% | -1.02% | +0.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.43% | -0.49% | -0.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.96% | — | — |
Volatility
CWIN.TO vs. ZDIV.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CWIN.TO | ZDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.52% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.69% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.16% | 9.99% | +2.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.89% | 9.99% | +3.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.89% | 9.99% | +3.90% |
CWIN.TO vs. ZDIV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CWIN.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than ZDIV.TO's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
CWIN.TO vs. ZDIV.TO - Dividend Comparison
CWIN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%, more than ZDIV.TO's 0.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CWIN.TO HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Enhanced Canadian Dividend ETF Class E Units | 3.19% | 3.21% |
ZDIV.TO BMO MSCI Canada IMI High Dividend Yield Index ETF | 0.90% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CWIN.TO and ZDIV.TO have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZDIV.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZDIV.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CWIN.TO.
CWIN.TO tracks Solactive Canada Dividend Elite Champions Index, while ZDIV.TO tracks MSCI Canada IMI High Dividend Yield Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Hamilton and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CWIN.TO and 0.09% for ZDIV.TO.
Find the right allocation for CWIN.TO and ZDIV.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer