CWIN.TO vs. VFV.TO
CWIN.TO (HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Enhanced Canadian Dividend ETF Class E Units) and VFV.TO (Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CWIN.TO is a Dividend fund tracking the Solactive Canada Dividend Elite Champions Index, while VFV.TO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, CWIN.TO returned 32.57% vs 29.48% for VFV.TO. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CWIN.TO charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VFV.TO.
Performance
CWIN.TO vs. VFV.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CWIN.TO achieves a 15.75% return, which is significantly higher than VFV.TO's 12.30% return.
CWIN.TO
- 1D
- 0.99%
- 1M
- 4.14%
- YTD
- 15.75%
- 6M
- 18.53%
- 1Y
- 32.57%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VFV.TO
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 7.30%
- YTD
- 12.30%
- 6M
- 10.47%
- 1Y
- 29.48%
- 3Y*
- 23.57%
- 5Y*
- 16.84%
- 10Y*
- 16.04%
CWIN.TO vs. VFV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CWIN.TO HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Enhanced Canadian Dividend ETF Class E Units | 15.75% | 25.14% |
VFV.TO Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF | 12.30% | 8.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between CWIN.TO and VFV.TO is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2025 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CWIN.TO vs. VFV.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CWIN.TO
VFV.TO
CWIN.TO vs. VFV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Enhanced Canadian Dividend ETF Class E Units (CWIN.TO) and Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CWIN.TO | VFV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.48 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.57 | 3.44 | +1.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.73 | 13.10 | +3.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CWIN.TO | VFV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.69 | 2.59 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.14 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.97 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.30 | 1.14 | +1.15 |
Drawdowns
CWIN.TO vs. VFV.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CWIN.TO drawdown since its inception was -10.87%, smaller than the maximum VFV.TO drawdown of -27.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWIN.TO and VFV.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CWIN.TO | VFV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.87% | -27.43% | +16.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.15% | -8.62% | +1.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.05% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.19% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.38% | -0.18% | -0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.43% | -3.35% | +1.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.96% | 2.26% | -0.30% |
Volatility
CWIN.TO vs. VFV.TO - Volatility Comparison
HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Enhanced Canadian Dividend ETF Class E Units (CWIN.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.52% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO) at 3.05%. This indicates that CWIN.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CWIN.TO | VFV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.52% | 3.05% | +0.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.69% | 8.55% | +1.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.16% | 11.46% | +0.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.89% | 14.91% | -1.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.89% | 16.57% | -2.68% |
CWIN.TO vs. VFV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CWIN.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than VFV.TO's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
CWIN.TO vs. VFV.TO - Dividend Comparison
CWIN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%, more than VFV.TO's 0.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWIN.TO HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Enhanced Canadian Dividend ETF Class E Units | 3.19% | 3.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VFV.TO Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF | 0.83% | 0.92% | 0.99% | 1.20% | 1.31% | 1.06% | 1.33% | 1.55% | 1.68% | 1.50% | 1.66% | 1.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CWIN.TO and VFV.TO have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VFV.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VFV.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CWIN.TO.
CWIN.TO is categorized as Dividend, while VFV.TO is S&P 500. CWIN.TO tracks Solactive Canada Dividend Elite Champions Index, while VFV.TO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Hamilton and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CWIN.TO and 0.09% for VFV.TO.
Find the right allocation for CWIN.TO and VFV.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer