PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CWIN.TO vs. VFV.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CWIN.TO vs. VFV.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Enhanced Canadian Dividend ETF Class E Units (CWIN.TO) and Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CWIN.TO achieves a 15.75% return, which is significantly higher than VFV.TO's 12.30% return.


CWIN.TO

1D
0.99%
1M
4.14%
YTD
15.75%
6M
18.53%
1Y
32.57%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VFV.TO

1D
-0.18%
1M
7.30%
YTD
12.30%
6M
10.47%
1Y
29.48%
3Y*
23.57%
5Y*
16.84%
10Y*
16.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CWIN.TO vs. VFV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CWIN.TO and VFV.TO is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2025

0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CWIN.TO vs. VFV.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CWIN.TO
CWIN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
CWIN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CWIN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
CWIN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
CWIN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
CWIN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

VFV.TO
VFV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
VFV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
VFV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CWIN.TO vs. VFV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Enhanced Canadian Dividend ETF Class E Units (CWIN.TO) and Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CWIN.TOVFV.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.48

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.57

3.44

+1.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.73

13.10

+3.63

CWIN.TO vs. VFV.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CWIN.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.69, which is comparable to the VFV.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CWIN.TO and VFV.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CWIN.TOVFV.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.69

2.59

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.30

1.14

+1.15

Drawdowns

CWIN.TO vs. VFV.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CWIN.TO drawdown since its inception was -10.87%, smaller than the maximum VFV.TO drawdown of -27.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWIN.TO and VFV.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CWIN.TOVFV.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.87%

-27.43%

+16.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.15%

-8.62%

+1.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.38%

-0.18%

-0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.43%

-3.35%

+1.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.96%

2.26%

-0.30%

Volatility

CWIN.TO vs. VFV.TO - Volatility Comparison

HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Enhanced Canadian Dividend ETF Class E Units (CWIN.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.52% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO) at 3.05%. This indicates that CWIN.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CWIN.TOVFV.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.52%

3.05%

+0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.69%

8.55%

+1.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.16%

11.46%

+0.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.89%

14.91%

-1.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.89%

16.57%

-2.68%

CWIN.TO vs. VFV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CWIN.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than VFV.TO's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

CWIN.TO vs. VFV.TO - Dividend Comparison

CWIN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%, more than VFV.TO's 0.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CWIN.TO
HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Enhanced Canadian Dividend ETF Class E Units
3.19%3.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VFV.TO
Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF
0.83%0.92%0.99%1.20%1.31%1.06%1.33%1.55%1.68%1.50%1.66%1.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


CWIN.TO and VFV.TO have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VFV.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VFV.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CWIN.TO.

CWIN.TO is categorized as Dividend, while VFV.TO is S&P 500. CWIN.TO tracks Solactive Canada Dividend Elite Champions Index, while VFV.TO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Hamilton and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CWIN.TO and 0.09% for VFV.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CWIN.TO and VFV.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer