PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CWII vs. TLDR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CWII vs. TLDR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF (CWII) and The Laddered T-Bill ETF (TLDR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CWII

1D
-5.26%
1M
-7.64%
YTD
37.23%
6M
17.21%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TLDR

1D
0.02%
1M
0.32%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CWII vs. TLDR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CWII and TLDR is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2026

-0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CWII vs. TLDR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF (CWII) and The Laddered T-Bill ETF (TLDR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CWII vs. TLDR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CWIITLDRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.38

8.82

-9.19

Drawdowns

CWII vs. TLDR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CWII drawdown since its inception was -48.46%, which is greater than TLDR's maximum drawdown of -0.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWII and TLDR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CWIITLDRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.46%

-0.05%

-48.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.63%

0.00%

-20.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.55%

-0.01%

-30.54%

Volatility

CWII vs. TLDR - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CWIITLDRDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

88.61%

0.39%

+88.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

88.61%

0.39%

+88.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

88.61%

0.39%

+88.22%

CWII vs. TLDR - Expense Ratio Comparison

CWII has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than TLDR's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

CWII vs. TLDR - Dividend Comparison

CWII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.73%, more than TLDR's 1.22% yield.


PositionTTM2025
CWII
REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF
20.73%6.09%
TLDR
The Laddered T-Bill ETF
1.22%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CWII and TLDR have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TLDR is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TLDR is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for CWII.

CWII has the higher dividend yield at 20.73%, compared with 1.22% for TLDR.

CWII is categorized as Derivative Income, while TLDR is Ultrashort Bond. Their fees differ too: 1.03% for CWII and 0.20% for TLDR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CWII and TLDR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer