CWII vs. IPDP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CWII (REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF) and IPDP (Dividend Performers ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. CWII charges 1.03%/yr vs 1.52%/yr for IPDP.

Performance

CWII vs. IPDP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF (CWII) and Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CWII

• 1D: -5.26%
• 1M: -7.64%
• YTD: 37.23%
• 6M: 17.21%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IPDP

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CWII vs. IPDP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CWII REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF	14.75%
IPDP Dividend Performers ETF	0.00%

Return for Risk

CWII vs. IPDP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF (CWII) and Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CWII	IPDP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.38	—	—

Drawdowns

CWII vs. IPDP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CWII drawdown since its inception was -48.46%, which is greater than IPDP's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWII and IPDP.

Drawdown Indicators

	CWII	IPDP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.46%	0.00%	-48.46%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.63%	0.00%	-20.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.55%	0.00%	-30.55%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CWII	IPDP	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	88.61%	0.00%	+88.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	88.61%	0.00%	+88.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	88.61%	0.00%	+88.61%

CWII vs. IPDP - Expense Ratio Comparison

CWII has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is lower than IPDP's 1.52% expense ratio.

Dividends

CWII vs. IPDP - Dividend Comparison

CWII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.73%, while IPDP has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
CWII REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF	20.73%	6.09%
IPDP Dividend Performers ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, CWII or IPDP?

On fees, CWII is cheaper at 1.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CWII or IPDP?

CWII is cheaper with a 1.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for IPDP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CWII or IPDP?

CWII has the higher dividend yield at 20.73%, compared with 0.00% for IPDP.

What is the main difference between CWII and IPDP?

They also come from different issuers: REX Shares and Innovative Portfolios. Their fees differ too: 1.03% for CWII and 1.52% for IPDP.