CWII vs. ETU
CWII (REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF) and ETU (T-Rex 2X Long Ether Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CWII is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by REX Shares, while ETU is a Leveraged Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by REX Shares. Both are actively managed. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CWII charges 1.03%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for ETU.
Performance
CWII vs. ETU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CWII achieves a 37.23% return, which is significantly higher than ETU's -71.31% return.
CWII
- 1D
- -5.26%
- 1M
- -7.64%
- YTD
- 37.23%
- 6M
- 17.21%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETU
- 1D
- -11.73%
- 1M
- -43.21%
- YTD
- -71.31%
- 6M
- -75.33%
- 1Y
- -75.01%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CWII vs. ETU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CWII REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF | 37.23% | -42.16% |
ETU T-Rex 2X Long Ether Daily Target ETF | -71.31% | -23.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between CWII and ETU is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CWII vs. ETU — Risk / Return Rank
CWII
ETU
CWII vs. ETU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF (CWII) and T-Rex 2X Long Ether Daily Target ETF (ETU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CWII | ETU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.38 | -0.47 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
CWII vs. ETU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CWII drawdown since its inception was -48.46%, smaller than the maximum ETU drawdown of -93.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWII and ETU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CWII | ETU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.46% | -93.02% | +44.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -91.48% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.63% | -93.02% | +72.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.55% | -62.40% | +31.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 62.07% | — |
Volatility
CWII vs. ETU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CWII | ETU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 20.58% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 92.66% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 88.61% | 136.54% | -47.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 88.61% | 145.94% | -57.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 88.61% | 145.94% | -57.33% |
CWII vs. ETU - Expense Ratio Comparison
CWII has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than ETU's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
CWII vs. ETU - Dividend Comparison
CWII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.73%, more than ETU's 0.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CWII REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF | 20.73% | 6.09% | 0.00% |
ETU T-Rex 2X Long Ether Daily Target ETF | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CWII and ETU have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ETU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ETU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for CWII.
CWII has the higher dividend yield at 20.73%, compared with 0.01% for ETU.
CWII is categorized as Derivative Income, while ETU is Leveraged Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 1.03% for CWII and 0.95% for ETU.
Find the right allocation for CWII and ETU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer