PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CWII vs. ETU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CWII vs. ETU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF (CWII) and T-Rex 2X Long Ether Daily Target ETF (ETU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CWII achieves a 37.23% return, which is significantly higher than ETU's -71.31% return.


CWII

1D
-5.26%
1M
-7.64%
YTD
37.23%
6M
17.21%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ETU

1D
-11.73%
1M
-43.21%
YTD
-71.31%
6M
-75.33%
1Y
-75.01%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CWII vs. ETU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
CWII
REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF
37.23%-42.16%
ETU
T-Rex 2X Long Ether Daily Target ETF
-71.31%-23.12%

Correlation

The correlation between CWII and ETU is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025

0.44

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CWII vs. ETU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CWII

ETU
ETU Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
ETU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETU Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETU Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
ETU Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETU Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CWII vs. ETU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF (CWII) and T-Rex 2X Long Ether Daily Target ETF (ETU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CWII vs. ETU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CWIIETUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.38

-0.47

+0.09

Drawdowns

CWII vs. ETU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CWII drawdown since its inception was -48.46%, smaller than the maximum ETU drawdown of -93.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWII and ETU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CWIIETUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.46%

-93.02%

+44.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-91.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.63%

-93.02%

+72.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.55%

-62.40%

+31.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

62.07%

Volatility

CWII vs. ETU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CWIIETUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

92.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

88.61%

136.54%

-47.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

88.61%

145.94%

-57.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

88.61%

145.94%

-57.33%

CWII vs. ETU - Expense Ratio Comparison

CWII has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than ETU's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

CWII vs. ETU - Dividend Comparison

CWII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.73%, more than ETU's 0.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
CWII
REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF
20.73%6.09%0.00%
ETU
T-Rex 2X Long Ether Daily Target ETF
0.01%0.00%0.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


CWII and ETU have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ETU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ETU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for CWII.

CWII has the higher dividend yield at 20.73%, compared with 0.01% for ETU.

CWII is categorized as Derivative Income, while ETU is Leveraged Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 1.03% for CWII and 0.95% for ETU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CWII and ETU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer