PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CWII vs. COII
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CWII vs. COII - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF (CWII) and REX COIN Growth & Income ETF (COII). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CWII achieves a 13,199.78% return, which is significantly higher than COII's -40.76% return.


CWII

1D
0.00%
1M
10,779.80%
6M
10,682.10%
YTD
13,199.78%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

COII

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
6M
-47.26%
YTD
-40.76%
1Y
-68.31%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CWII vs. COII - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
CWII
REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF
13,199.78%-45.06%
COII
REX COIN Growth & Income ETF
-40.76%-33.72%

Correlation

The correlation between CWII and COII is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2025

0.39

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CWII vs. COII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF (CWII) and REX COIN Growth & Income ETF (COII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CWIICOIIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.80

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.33

CWII vs. COII - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CWII vs. COII - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CWII drawdown since its inception was -51.04%, smaller than the maximum COII drawdown of -72.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWII and COII.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CWIICOIIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.04%

-72.22%

+21.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-72.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-70.51%

+70.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.26%

-41.08%

+7.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

48.77%

Volatility

CWII vs. COII - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CWIICOIIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

51.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13,701.30%

66.59%

+13,634.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13,701.30%

66.93%

+13,634.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13,701.30%

66.93%

+13,634.37%

CWII vs. COII - Expense Ratio Comparison

CWII has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than COII's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

CWII vs. COII - Dividend Comparison

Neither CWII nor COII has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025
COII
REX COIN Growth & Income ETF
75.93%41.52%
CWII
REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF
123.26%6.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


CWII and COII have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, COII is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

COII is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for CWII.

CWII has the higher dividend yield at 123.26%, compared with 75.93% for COII.

Their fees differ too: 1.03% for CWII and 0.99% for COII.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CWII and COII

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer