CWII vs. ATCL
CWII (REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF) and ATCL (REX Autocallable Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from REX Shares. Both are actively managed. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CWII charges 1.03%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ATCL.
Performance
CWII vs. ATCL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CWII
- 1D
- -5.26%
- 1M
- -7.64%
- YTD
- 37.23%
- 6M
- 17.21%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ATCL
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.23%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CWII vs. ATCL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CWII REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF | 8.01% |
ATCL REX Autocallable Income ETF | 3.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between CWII and ATCL is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2026 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CWII vs. ATCL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF (CWII) and REX Autocallable Income ETF (ATCL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CWII | ATCL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.38 | 1.42 | -1.80 |
Drawdowns
CWII vs. ATCL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CWII drawdown since its inception was -48.46%, which is greater than ATCL's maximum drawdown of -6.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWII and ATCL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CWII | ATCL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.46% | -6.08% | -42.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.63% | -0.32% | -20.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.55% | -0.87% | -29.68% |
Volatility
CWII vs. ATCL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CWII | ATCL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 88.61% | 9.00% | +79.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 88.61% | 9.00% | +79.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 88.61% | 9.00% | +79.61% |
CWII vs. ATCL - Expense Ratio Comparison
CWII has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than ATCL's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
CWII vs. ATCL - Dividend Comparison
CWII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.73%, more than ATCL's 3.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ATCL REX Autocallable Income ETF | 3.38% | 0.00% |
CWII REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF | 20.73% | 6.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CWII and ATCL have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ATCL is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ATCL is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for CWII.
CWII has the higher dividend yield at 20.73%, compared with 3.38% for ATCL.
Their fees differ too: 1.03% for CWII and 0.65% for ATCL.
Find the right allocation for CWII and ATCL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer