CWII vs. ACII
CWII (REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF) and ACII (Innovator Index Autocallable Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CWII charges 1.03%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for ACII.
Performance
CWII vs. ACII - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CWII
- 1D
- -5.26%
- 1M
- -7.64%
- YTD
- 37.23%
- 6M
- 17.21%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ACII
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CWII vs. ACII - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CWII REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF | 4.41% |
ACII Innovator Index Autocallable Income Strategy ETF | -1.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between CWII and ACII is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | 0.80 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CWII vs. ACII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF (CWII) and Innovator Index Autocallable Income Strategy ETF (ACII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CWII | ACII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.38 | -7.55 | +7.18 |
Drawdowns
CWII vs. ACII - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CWII drawdown since its inception was -48.46%, which is greater than ACII's maximum drawdown of -1.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWII and ACII.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CWII | ACII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.46% | -1.27% | -47.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.63% | -1.27% | -19.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.55% | -0.42% | -30.13% |
Volatility
CWII vs. ACII - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CWII | ACII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 88.61% | 7.65% | +80.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 88.61% | 7.65% | +80.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 88.61% | 7.65% | +80.96% |
CWII vs. ACII - Expense Ratio Comparison
CWII has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than ACII's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
CWII vs. ACII - Dividend Comparison
CWII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.73%, more than ACII's 0.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ACII Innovator Index Autocallable Income Strategy ETF | 0.74% | 0.00% |
CWII REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF | 20.73% | 6.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CWII and ACII have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ACII is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ACII is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for CWII.
CWII has the higher dividend yield at 20.73%, compared with 0.74% for ACII.
They also come from different issuers: REX Shares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.03% for CWII and 0.79% for ACII.
Find the right allocation for CWII and ACII
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer