PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CWII vs. ACII
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CWII vs. ACII - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF (CWII) and Innovator Index Autocallable Income Strategy ETF (ACII). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CWII

1D
-5.26%
1M
-7.64%
YTD
37.23%
6M
17.21%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ACII

1D
-0.95%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CWII vs. ACII - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CWII and ACII is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026

0.80

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CWII vs. ACII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF (CWII) and Innovator Index Autocallable Income Strategy ETF (ACII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CWII vs. ACII - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CWIIACIIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.38

-7.55

+7.18

Drawdowns

CWII vs. ACII - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CWII drawdown since its inception was -48.46%, which is greater than ACII's maximum drawdown of -1.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWII and ACII.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CWIIACIIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.46%

-1.27%

-47.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.63%

-1.27%

-19.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.55%

-0.42%

-30.13%

Volatility

CWII vs. ACII - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CWIIACIIDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

88.61%

7.65%

+80.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

88.61%

7.65%

+80.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

88.61%

7.65%

+80.96%

CWII vs. ACII - Expense Ratio Comparison

CWII has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than ACII's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

CWII vs. ACII - Dividend Comparison

CWII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.73%, more than ACII's 0.74% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


CWII and ACII have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ACII is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ACII is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for CWII.

CWII has the higher dividend yield at 20.73%, compared with 0.74% for ACII.

They also come from different issuers: REX Shares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.03% for CWII and 0.79% for ACII.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CWII and ACII

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer