CWI vs. EXUS.L
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF (CWI) and Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C USD (EXUS.L).
CWI and EXUS.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CWI is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the MSCI All Country World ex-U.S. Index. It was launched on Jan 10, 2007. EXUS.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI World ex USA index. It was launched on Mar 6, 2024. Both CWI and EXUS.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
CWI vs. EXUS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CWI vs. EXUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CWI SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF | 1.87% | 32.75% | 2.74% |
EXUS.L Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C USD | -0.98% | 31.98% | 1.23% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CWI achieves a 1.87% return, which is significantly higher than EXUS.L's -0.98% return.
CWI
- 1D
- 3.22%
- 1M
- -8.11%
- YTD
- 1.87%
- 6M
- 6.68%
- 1Y
- 27.73%
- 3Y*
- 15.86%
- 5Y*
- 7.61%
- 10Y*
- 9.02%
EXUS.L
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- -9.67%
- YTD
- -0.98%
- 6M
- 4.78%
- 1Y
- 23.18%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CWI vs. EXUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CWI has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than EXUS.L's 0.15% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CWI vs. EXUS.L — Risk / Return Rank
CWI
EXUS.L
CWI vs. EXUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF (CWI) and Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C USD (EXUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CWI | EXUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.61 | 1.44 | +0.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.21 | 1.95 | +0.26 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.29 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.34 | 2.05 | +0.29 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.07 | 7.82 | +1.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CWI | EXUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.61 | 1.44 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 0.97 | -0.75 |
Correlation
The correlation between CWI and EXUS.L is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CWI vs. EXUS.L - Dividend Comparison
CWI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%, while EXUS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWI SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF | 2.91% | 2.97% | 2.89% | 2.80% | 3.17% | 2.65% | 2.07% | 3.05% | 2.81% | 2.29% | 2.45% | 2.62% |
EXUS.L Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C USD | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CWI vs. EXUS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CWI drawdown since its inception was -60.77%, which is greater than EXUS.L's maximum drawdown of -12.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWI and EXUS.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CWI | EXUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.77% | -12.85% | -47.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.47% | -10.74% | -0.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.45% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.57% | -9.67% | +1.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.95% | -2.33% | -10.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.96% | 2.82% | +0.14% |
Volatility
CWI vs. EXUS.L - Volatility Comparison
SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF (CWI) has a higher volatility of 8.14% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C USD (EXUS.L) at 7.08%. This indicates that CWI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EXUS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CWI | EXUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.14% | 7.08% | +1.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.60% | 10.31% | +1.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.37% | 16.03% | +1.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.01% | 14.81% | +1.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.05% | 14.81% | +2.24% |