CWGIX vs. RTXAX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

CWGIX (American Funds Capital World Growth and Income Fund Class A) and RTXAX (Russell Investment Tax-Managed Real Assets Fund) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, CWGIX returned 11.28%/yr vs 6.26%/yr for RTXAX. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CWGIX charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.33%/yr for RTXAX.

Performance

CWGIX vs. RTXAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Capital World Growth and Income Fund Class A (CWGIX) and Russell Investment Tax-Managed Real Assets Fund (RTXAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CWGIX having a 15.66% return and RTXAX slightly lower at 15.17%.

CWGIX

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 2.79%
• YTD: 15.66%
• 6M: 15.21%
• 1Y: 32.16%
• 3Y*: 21.57%
• 5Y*: 11.28%
• 10Y*: 12.54%

RTXAX

• 1D: 0.59%
• 1M: -1.86%
• YTD: 15.17%
• 6M: 14.91%
• 1Y: 25.38%
• 3Y*: 12.68%
• 5Y*: 6.26%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CWGIX vs. RTXAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
CWGIX American Funds Capital World Growth and Income Fund Class A	15.66%	24.68%	13.85%	20.55%	-17.32%	14.74%	15.31%	11.46%
RTXAX Russell Investment Tax-Managed Real Assets Fund	15.17%	13.56%	1.50%	7.40%	-11.66%	26.57%	3.73%	6.17%

Correlation

The correlation between CWGIX and RTXAX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.54
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.65
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2019	0.77

Over the past year, the correlation between CWGIX and RTXAX has dropped to 0.54 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

CWGIX vs. RTXAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CWGIX

CWGIX Risk / Return Rank: 71
CWGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
CWGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
CWGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 68
CWGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
CWGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 77

RTXAX

RTXAX Risk / Return Rank: 80
RTXAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
RTXAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
RTXAX Omega Ratio Rank: 64
RTXAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
RTXAX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CWGIX vs. RTXAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Capital World Growth and Income Fund Class A (CWGIX) and Russell Investment Tax-Managed Real Assets Fund (RTXAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CWGIX	RTXAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.28	2.35	-0.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.11	3.19	-0.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.41	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.14	4.99	-1.85
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.44	18.57	-5.13

CWGIX vs. RTXAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CWGIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the RTXAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CWGIX and RTXAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CWGIX vs. RTXAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CWGIX drawdown since its inception was -54.47%, which is greater than RTXAX's maximum drawdown of -40.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWGIX and RTXAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CWGIX	RTXAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.47%	-40.68%	-13.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.52%	-5.21%	-5.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.56%	-17.13%	+1.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.18%	-24.63%	-2.55%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.00%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.67%	-2.42%	+1.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.12%	-7.73%	+0.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.46%	1.40%	+1.06%

Volatility

CWGIX vs. RTXAX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds Capital World Growth and Income Fund Class A (CWGIX) has a higher volatility of 6.02% compared to Russell Investment Tax-Managed Real Assets Fund (RTXAX) at 3.40%. This indicates that CWGIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RTXAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CWGIX	RTXAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.02%	3.40%	+2.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.20%	8.34%	+3.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.55%	11.07%	+3.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.38%	15.82%	-0.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.11%	20.02%	-3.91%

CWGIX vs. RTXAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CWGIX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than RTXAX's 1.33% expense ratio.

Dividends

CWGIX vs. RTXAX - Dividend Comparison

CWGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.18%, more than RTXAX's 2.49% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CWGIX American Funds Capital World Growth and Income Fund Class A	9.18%	10.54%	7.88%	3.20%	2.09%	6.82%	1.23%	2.44%	7.00%	6.63%	4.96%	3.78%
RTXAX Russell Investment Tax-Managed Real Assets Fund	2.49%	2.86%	2.05%	1.98%	3.11%	1.74%	1.71%	0.84%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CWGIX and RTXAX in my portfolio?

CWGIX and RTXAX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CWGIX or RTXAX?

CWGIX has higher volatility (6.02%) compared to RTXAX (3.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CWGIX dropped -54.47% vs RTXAX's -40.68%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RTXAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.