PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CWGIX vs. MDGCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CWGIX vs. MDGCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Capital World Growth and Income Fund Class A (CWGIX) and BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc. (MDGCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CWGIX achieves a 14.52% return, which is significantly lower than MDGCX's 16.34% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CWGIX having a 11.90% annualized return and MDGCX not far ahead at 12.17%.


CWGIX

1D
0.69%
1M
0.76%
6M
10.41%
YTD
14.52%
1Y
25.88%
3Y*
20.85%
5Y*
10.89%
10Y*
11.90%

MDGCX

1D
0.66%
1M
-0.40%
6M
13.15%
YTD
16.34%
1Y
31.41%
3Y*
20.11%
5Y*
10.77%
10Y*
12.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CWGIX vs. MDGCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CWGIX
American Funds Capital World Growth and Income Fund Class A
14.52%24.68%13.85%20.55%-17.32%14.74%15.31%25.32%-10.60%24.55%
MDGCX
BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc.
16.34%23.61%10.87%22.43%-17.94%17.52%15.61%25.54%-11.73%23.41%

Correlation

The correlation between CWGIX and MDGCX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 1994

0.87

The correlation between CWGIX and MDGCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CWGIX vs. MDGCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CWGIX
CWGIX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
CWGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CWGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
CWGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
CWGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
CWGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

MDGCX
MDGCX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
MDGCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDGCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDGCX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
MDGCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDGCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CWGIX vs. MDGCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Capital World Growth and Income Fund Class A (CWGIX) and BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc. (MDGCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CWGIXMDGCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.42

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

3.87

-1.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.33

15.57

-5.23

CWGIX vs. MDGCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CWGIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is comparable to the MDGCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CWGIX and MDGCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CWGIX vs. MDGCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CWGIX drawdown since its inception was -54.47%, which is greater than MDGCX's maximum drawdown of -48.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWGIX and MDGCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CWGIXMDGCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.47%

-48.25%

-6.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.52%

-8.07%

-2.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.56%

-21.46%

+5.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.18%

-26.68%

-0.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.00%

-34.87%

+2.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.65%

-2.90%

+1.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.12%

-9.91%

+2.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.50%

2.00%

+0.50%

Volatility

CWGIX vs. MDGCX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds Capital World Growth and Income Fund Class A (CWGIX) has a higher volatility of 5.35% compared to BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc. (MDGCX) at 4.78%. This indicates that CWGIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MDGCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CWGIXMDGCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.35%

4.78%

+0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.38%

11.28%

+1.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.71%

13.54%

+1.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.42%

16.30%

-0.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.98%

17.11%

-1.13%

CWGIX vs. MDGCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CWGIX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than MDGCX's 0.96% expense ratio.


Dividends

CWGIX vs. MDGCX - Dividend Comparison

CWGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.27%, more than MDGCX's 7.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CWGIX
American Funds Capital World Growth and Income Fund Class A
9.27%10.54%7.88%3.20%2.09%6.82%1.23%2.44%7.00%6.63%4.96%3.78%
MDGCX
BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc.
7.66%8.91%7.78%1.42%1.75%16.75%3.77%1.73%4.06%34.82%0.65%5.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, CWGIX and MDGCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

CWGIX has higher volatility (5.35%) compared to MDGCX (4.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CWGIX dropped -54.47% vs MDGCX's -48.25%.

MDGCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CWGIX and MDGCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer