PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CW8U.L vs. WPEA.PA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CW8U.L vs. WPEA.PA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI World UCITS USD (CW8U.L) and iShares MSCI World Swap PEA UCITS ETF (WPEA.PA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CW8U.L is traded in USD, while WPEA.PA is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the WPEA.PA values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CW8U.L having a 9.80% return and WPEA.PA slightly lower at 9.77%.


CW8U.L

1D
0.08%
1M
4.18%
YTD
9.80%
6M
10.88%
1Y
25.61%
3Y*
20.52%
5Y*
11.60%
10Y*
12.85%

WPEA.PA

1D
0.06%
1M
4.13%
YTD
9.77%
6M
10.98%
1Y
25.74%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CW8U.L vs. WPEA.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CW8U.L
Amundi MSCI World UCITS USD
9.80%20.32%10.93%
WPEA.PA
iShares MSCI World Swap PEA UCITS ETF
9.77%21.25%10.11%

Correlation

The correlation between CW8U.L and WPEA.PA is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2024

0.89

The correlation between CW8U.L and WPEA.PA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CW8U.L vs. WPEA.PA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CW8U.L
CW8U.L Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
CW8U.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CW8U.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
CW8U.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
CW8U.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
CW8U.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

WPEA.PA
WPEA.PA Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
WPEA.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WPEA.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
WPEA.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
WPEA.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
WPEA.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CW8U.L vs. WPEA.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI World UCITS USD (CW8U.L) and iShares MSCI World Swap PEA UCITS ETF (WPEA.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CW8U.LWPEA.PADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.40

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.01

3.00

0.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.87

13.02

-0.14

CW8U.L vs. WPEA.PA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CW8U.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is comparable to the WPEA.PA Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CW8U.L and WPEA.PA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CW8U.LWPEA.PADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.16

2.21

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

1.28

-0.55

Drawdowns

CW8U.L vs. WPEA.PA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CW8U.L drawdown since its inception was -34.10%, which is greater than WPEA.PA's maximum drawdown of -17.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CW8U.L and WPEA.PA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CW8U.LWPEA.PADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.10%

-17.82%

-16.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.48%

-8.47%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.41%

-0.52%

+0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.49%

-1.75%

-2.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.98%

1.96%

+0.02%

Volatility

CW8U.L vs. WPEA.PA - Volatility Comparison

Amundi MSCI World UCITS USD (CW8U.L) has a higher volatility of 3.27% compared to iShares MSCI World Swap PEA UCITS ETF (WPEA.PA) at 2.88%. This indicates that CW8U.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WPEA.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CW8U.LWPEA.PADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.27%

2.88%

+0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.09%

8.56%

+0.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.80%

11.52%

+0.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.58%

14.79%

+0.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.84%

14.79%

+1.05%

CW8U.L vs. WPEA.PA - Expense Ratio Comparison

CW8U.L has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than WPEA.PA's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

CW8U.L vs. WPEA.PA - Dividend Comparison

Neither CW8U.L nor WPEA.PA has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, CW8U.L and WPEA.PA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, WPEA.PA is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WPEA.PA is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for CW8U.L.

CW8U.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while WPEA.PA tracks MSCI World NET TR EUR Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for CW8U.L and 0.25% for WPEA.PA.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CW8U.L and WPEA.PA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer