CVY vs. DWAT
CVY (Invesco Zacks Multi-Asset Income ETF) and DWAT (Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CVY is a Diversified Portfolio fund tracking the Zacks Multi-Asset Income Index, while DWAT is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by Arrow Funds. CVY is passively managed, while DWAT is actively managed. CVY charges 1.21%/yr vs 1.83%/yr for DWAT.
Performance
CVY vs. DWAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CVY
- 1D
- -1.25%
- 1M
- 0.78%
- YTD
- 7.59%
- 6M
- 8.13%
- 1Y
- 17.25%
- 3Y*
- 15.33%
- 5Y*
- 7.04%
- 10Y*
- 8.41%
DWAT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CVY vs. DWAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CVY Invesco Zacks Multi-Asset Income ETF | 0.40% |
DWAT Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF | 0.00% |
CVY vs. DWAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CVY
DWAT
Financial Services
Energy
Real Estate
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Financial Services
CVY
DWAT
Energy
CVY
DWAT
Real Estate
CVY
DWAT
Technology
CVY
DWAT
Consumer Cyclical
CVY
DWAT
Industrials
CVY
DWAT
Healthcare
CVY
DWAT
Basic Materials
CVY
DWAT
Communication Services
CVY
DWAT
Consumer Defensive
CVY
DWAT
Utilities
CVY
DWAT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CVY vs. DWAT — Risk / Return Rank
CVY
DWAT
CVY vs. DWAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Zacks Multi-Asset Income ETF (CVY) and Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF (DWAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CVY | DWAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.33 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.82 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CVY | DWAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | — | — |
Drawdowns
CVY vs. DWAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CVY drawdown since its inception was -66.86%, which is greater than DWAT's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVY and DWAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CVY | DWAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.86% | 0.00% | -66.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.43% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.79% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.47% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.28% | 0.00% | -1.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.41% | 0.00% | -10.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.21% | — | — |
Volatility
CVY vs. DWAT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CVY | DWAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.87% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.81% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.00% | 0.00% | +11.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.20% | 0.00% | +16.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.56% | 0.00% | +19.56% |
CVY vs. DWAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
CVY has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is lower than DWAT's 1.83% expense ratio.
Dividends
CVY vs. DWAT - Dividend Comparison
CVY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%, while DWAT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVY Invesco Zacks Multi-Asset Income ETF | 3.75% | 3.99% | 4.07% | 4.41% | 5.18% | 2.37% | 3.40% | 3.22% | 4.44% | 3.94% | 4.50% | 5.89% |
DWAT Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, CVY is cheaper at 1.21% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CVY is cheaper with a 1.21% expense ratio, compared with 1.83% for DWAT.
CVY has the higher dividend yield at 3.75%, compared with 0.00% for DWAT.
CVY is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while DWAT is Tactical Allocation. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Arrow Funds. Their fees differ too: 1.21% for CVY and 1.83% for DWAT.
Find the right allocation for CVY and DWAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer