CVSM vs. RSSL
CVSM (CresAlta Small & Mid-Cap ETF) and RSSL (Global X Russell 2000 ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. CVSM is actively managed, while RSSL is passively managed. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CVSM charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for RSSL.
Performance
CVSM vs. RSSL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CVSM
- 1D
- 1.17%
- 1M
- 0.85%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RSSL
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 1.10%
- 6M
- 12.00%
- YTD
- 20.61%
- 1Y
- 35.14%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CVSM vs. RSSL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CVSM CresAlta Small & Mid-Cap ETF | 4.32% |
RSSL Global X Russell 2000 ETF | 6.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between CVSM and RSSL is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2026 | 0.60 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CVSM vs. RSSL — Risk / Return Rank
CVSM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RSSL
CVSM vs. RSSL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CresAlta Small & Mid-Cap ETF (CVSM) and Global X Russell 2000 ETF (RSSL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CVSM | RSSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.30 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.23 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.32 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CVSM vs. RSSL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CVSM drawdown since its inception was -3.36%, smaller than the maximum RSSL drawdown of -27.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVSM and RSSL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CVSM | RSSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.36% | -27.79% | +24.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.93% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.33% | -1.49% | +1.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.01% | -5.44% | +4.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.11% | — |
Volatility
CVSM vs. RSSL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CVSM | RSSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.61% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.03% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.11% | 19.31% | -8.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.11% | 22.23% | -11.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.11% | 22.23% | -11.12% |
CVSM vs. RSSL - Expense Ratio Comparison
CVSM has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than RSSL's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
CVSM vs. RSSL - Dividend Comparison
CVSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, less than RSSL's 1.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CVSM CresAlta Small & Mid-Cap ETF | 0.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RSSL Global X Russell 2000 ETF | 1.22% | 1.35% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CVSM and RSSL have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RSSL is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RSSL is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for CVSM.
RSSL has the higher dividend yield at 1.22%, compared with 0.23% for CVSM.
They also come from different issuers: CresAlta and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for CVSM and 0.08% for RSSL.
Find the right allocation for CVSM and RSSL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer