PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CVSB vs. UX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CVSB vs. UX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert Ultra-Short Investment Grade ETF (CVSB) and Roundhill Uranium ETF (UX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVSB achieves a 2.14% return, which is significantly higher than UX's -7.20% return.


CVSB

1D
0.01%
1M
0.36%
6M
1.74%
YTD
2.14%
1Y
4.25%
3Y*
5.41%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.37%

UX

1D
-0.42%
1M
-3.39%
6M
-20.24%
YTD
-7.20%
1Y
8.41%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
6.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.01M$2.16M$1.65M
$78.52K$83.79K$172.73K

CVSB vs. UX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
CVSB
Calvert Ultra-Short Investment Grade ETF
2.14%4.67%
UX
Roundhill Uranium ETF
-7.20%18.96%

Correlation

The correlation between CVSB and UX is 0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2025

-0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CVSB vs. UX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CVSB
CVSB Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
CVSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVSB Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
CVSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVSB Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

UX
UX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
UX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
UX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
UX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
UX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CVSB vs. UX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert Ultra-Short Investment Grade ETF (CVSB) and Roundhill Uranium ETF (UX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CVSBUXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+5.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+8.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.49

1.08

+1.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

19.43

0.42

+19.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

81.65

0.76

+80.89

CVSB vs. UX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVSB Sharpe Ratio is 5.32, which is higher than the UX Sharpe Ratio of 0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVSB and UX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CVSB vs. UX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVSB drawdown since its inception was -0.63%, smaller than the maximum UX drawdown of -26.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVSB and UX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CVSBUXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.63%

-26.11%

+25.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.23%

-26.11%

+25.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.01%

-24.92%

+24.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.05%

-11.56%

+11.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.05%

14.45%

-14.40%

Volatility

CVSB vs. UX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calvert Ultra-Short Investment Grade ETF (CVSB) is 0.20%, while Roundhill Uranium ETF (UX) has a volatility of 9.15%. This indicates that CVSB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CVSBUXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.20%

9.15%

-8.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.57%

22.93%

-22.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83%

34.30%

-33.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.30%

35.49%

-34.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.30%

35.49%

-34.19%

CVSB vs. UX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CVSB has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than UX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

CVSB vs. UX - Dividend Comparison

CVSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.28%, more than UX's 1.59% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
CVSB
Calvert Ultra-Short Investment Grade ETF
4.28%4.72%5.13%4.95%
UX
Roundhill Uranium ETF
1.59%1.48%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CVSB and UX have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UX has higher volatility (9.15%) compared to CVSB (0.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVSB dropped -0.63% vs UX's -26.11%.

On 1-year performance, UX leads with 8.41% vs 4.25% for CVSB. On fees, CVSB is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, CVSB has been the lower-risk option at 0.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, UX has performed better with a 8.41% return vs 4.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CVSB is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UX.

CVSB has the higher dividend yield at 4.28%, compared with 1.59% for UX.

CVSB is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while UX is Uranium. They also come from different issuers: Calvert and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for CVSB and 0.75% for UX.

CVSB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.32 vs 0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CVSB and UX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer